Incorrect:<\/strong> The results of the experiment shows a significant difference.
\nCorrect:<\/strong> The results of the experiment show a significant difference.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Here, \u201cresults\u201d is the subject, so the plural verb \u201cshow\u201d is required. A useful way to catch these errors is to temporarily ignore phrases between the subject and verb and identify the main subject first. Subject-verb agreement is also an important area of grammar in academic writing guidance. (Fordham University<\/a>)<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/span> Inconsistent Verb Tenses<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Once subject-verb agreement is correct, the next question is whether the verb tense accurately reflects the research being described. Academic papers often move between different time frames, so tense should change when the meaning requires it, not simply because the writer has moved to a new sentence.<\/p>\n
For example, researchers generally describe completed procedures in the past tense: \u201cSamples were collected from three sites.\u201d However, established knowledge may be presented in the present tense: \u201cPrevious studies suggest that temperature affects growth.\u201d The appropriate tense can depend on the section and discipline, so researchers should also follow the conventions of their target journal. (PubMed Central<\/a>)<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Problems With Articles<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Small words can create problems for researchers writing in English, particularly when English is an additional language. Articles such as \u201ca,\u201d \u201can,\u201d and \u201cthe\u201d tell readers whether a noun refers to something general, one unspecified example, or something specific.<\/p>\n
\n
Incorrect:<\/strong> The researchers collected data from laboratory in India.
\nCorrect:<\/strong> The researchers collected data from a laboratory in India.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Because articles are easily overlooked during proofreading, they can remain in a manuscript even after several rounds of editing. Research examining grammatical errors in published health-care articles has also identified article errors as a common category. (PubMed Central<\/a>)<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Unclear Pronoun References<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Another common problem occurs when a pronoun does not clearly identify what it refers to. Words such as \u201cthis,\u201d \u201cit,\u201d \u201cthey,\u201d and \u201cwhich\u201d are useful for avoiding repetition, but they can make research writing vague when several possible references appear in the same sentence.<\/p>\n
Unclear:<\/strong> The researchers changed the protocol after the trial, which improved the results.<\/p>\n
The reader may not immediately know whether \u201cwhich\u201d refers to the trial, the protocol, or the change itself. A clearer version is:<\/p>\n
Clear:<\/strong> Changing the protocol after the trial improved the results.<\/p>\n
When a pronoun could have more than one possible reference, repeating the important noun is often better than leaving the reader to interpret it.<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Misplaced and Dangling Modifiers<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Clarity can also suffer when descriptive phrases are separated from the words they are intended to modify. This is particularly common in long sentences describing research procedures.<\/p>\n
\n
Incorrect:<\/strong> Using the revised protocol, the results were analyzed by the researchers.
\nCorrect:<\/strong> Using the revised protocol, the researchers analyzed the results.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The first sentence suggests that the results used the protocol. The second clearly identifies the researchers as the ones who used it. Keeping modifiers close to the words they describe can prevent this unintended meaning. (Oxford University Press<\/a>)<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Overly Complicated Sentence Structures<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Researchers often need to communicate several pieces of information in one sentence. However, adding too many clauses can make the grammatical structure difficult to control. This can lead to run-on sentences, fragments, misplaced phrases, or sentences in which the main point becomes difficult to identify.<\/p>\n
Difficult:<\/strong> The samples were collected from three locations that were selected based on their proximity to the treatment area and because previous studies had reported similar conditions and they were stored at 4\u00b0C before analysis.<\/p>\n
Breaking the information into two sentences can make the relationship between the ideas clearer:<\/p>\n
Clearer:<\/strong> The samples were collected from three locations selected for their proximity to the treatment area and similarity to conditions reported in previous studies. They were stored at 4\u00b0C before analysis.<\/p>\n
The goal is not to make every sentence short. Instead, each sentence should have a structure that readers can follow easily.<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Inconsistent Parallel Structure<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
The same principle applies when presenting multiple research aims, methods, or findings. When items perform the same grammatical role, they should generally follow the same structure.<\/p>\n
\n
Incorrect:<\/strong> The study aimed to identify risk factors, evaluating outcomes, and to compare treatment groups.<\/p>\n
Correct:<\/strong> The study aimed to identify risk factors, evaluate outcomes, and compare treatment groups.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The corrected version makes the three research aims easier to recognize because they use the same verb form. Consistency becomes especially important when sentences contain several items that readers need to compare.<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Problems With Active and Passive Voice<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Voice is another area where researchers can improve clarity. Passive voice is not grammatically incorrect and can be useful when the action or procedure is more important than the person performing it.<\/p>\n
\n
Passive:<\/strong> The samples were analyzed using microscopy.
\nActive:<\/strong> We analyzed the samples using microscopy.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Both sentences are grammatically correct. The better choice depends on the context and the journal\u2019s style. Researchers should avoid changing every passive sentence into an active one simply because active voice is often considered clearer. Instead, choose the construction that keeps the focus on the most important information. (George Mason University<\/a>)<\/p>\n
\n
\n
<\/span> Punctuation and Sentence Boundaries<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
After checking sentence structure, review punctuation. Commas, semicolons, and periods help readers understand how clauses and ideas relate to one another. Incorrect punctuation can therefore affect meaning as well as readability.<\/p>\n
One common problem is a comma splice, where two independent clauses are joined only by a comma.<\/p>\n
\n
Incorrect:<\/strong> The samples were stored at 4\u00b0C, they were analyzed the next day.<\/p>\n
Correct:<\/strong> The samples were stored at 4\u00b0C, and they were analyzed the next day.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Reading complicated sentences slowly during the final editing stage can help researchers notice places where punctuation or a sentence break is needed. (University of Toronto Mississauga<\/a>)<\/p>\n
<\/span>Conclusion<\/span><\/h2>\n
\n
Treat grammar as a separate editing stage:<\/strong> Review language after completing the manuscript\u2019s content and structure, focusing specifically on grammar and sentence-level issues.<\/li>\n
Check common grammar issues systematically:<\/strong> Review subject-verb agreement, verb tense, articles, pronouns, modifiers, sentence boundaries, parallel structure, and punctuation.<\/li>\n
Review sentences in context:<\/strong> A grammatically correct sentence can still cause confusion within a paragraph. Check pronoun references, tense consistency, and the flow between sentences.<\/li>\n
Use a grammar checker as an additional review:<\/strong> Tools such as Trinka Grammar Checker<\/a> can help identify grammar, spelling, punctuation, sentence-structure, and word-choice issues in academic and technical writing.<\/li>\n
Apply your own judgment:<\/strong> Always review grammar suggestions in context, especially when working with specialized terminology, research methods, and discipline-specific language.<\/li>\n
Focus on clarity, not simplification:<\/strong> Good academic writing does not mean removing complexity. It means presenting complex ideas clearly, precisely, and in a way that readers can easily follow.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Learn about common academic grammar mistakes that can weaken research writing and discover how to improve clarity, accuracy, readability, and overall writing quality.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":7607,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[175],"tags":[],"acf":[],"featured_image_url":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/Trinka-New-Blog-Banners-2026-56.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7606"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7606"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7606\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7608,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7606\/revisions\/7608"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7607"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.trinka.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}