How to Write an Effective Chemistry Research Paper (Part 1)

Here, we will state the rules about the format and content of a research paper in chemistry and explain the scientific conventions used in chemistry papers. These rules and conventions will help you write research papers in chemistry effectively and confidently. Alternatively, there is an AI-driven language enhancement tool, Trinka, which could be used. Trinka is world’s first online grammar checker and language correction tool that is custom-built for academic writing and caters to subject-specific requirements.

Let us explore the rules about writing an effective Chemistry research paper.

Format and Content of Chemistry Articles

Readers expect two things while reading your paper:

  • Understand the information presented
  • Know that the findings are legitimate

How to Fulfill these Objectives?

  • Introduction
  • Methods and Materials
  • Results
  • Discussion

This format may slightly differ depending on the journal; for instance, some journals ask you to include an abstract or separate section for the hypothesis. Overall, however, this represents a textual version of the scientific method.


Select terms that are as precise as the text permits.


Avoid: A magnetic alloy

Use: A vanadium-iron alloy

Things to Avoid

  • Phrases such as “on the,” “a study of,” “research on,” and “regarding.”
  • Non-quantitative, meaningless words such as “rapid” and “new.”


A quality abstract distinctly identifies the objective of the experiment and the key outcomes.

Things to Avoid

  • Beginning with “The purpose of this experiment was…” Such background information belongs in the Introduction section.
  • RBe specific about what was done.
  • Vague statements such as “…a metal complex was prepared, and the percent yield was calculated.
    • Instead use, “…hexaammine cobalt (III) chloride was prepared from cobalt (II), chloride, and hydrogen peroxide. The yield was 8.45 g.

Tip 1

When writing a full report, write the Abstract last.


Go step-wise!

  • Begin by describing the larger area of the research
  • Give examples of advancement in the field
  • A distinct statement of the research problem
  • Approach being addressed in the current report


Avoid: This experiment intends to investigate upon any measurable amounts of Nickel in the surrounding mud area and within barnacles living on the pilings.

Use: The purpose of this study is to determine the nickel content in the surrounding mud area and in the barnacles living on the pilings.

Methods and Materials

Include a description of your experimental procedure and the names of instruments used. Do not rewrite the lab manual or protocol.


Avoid: Next, prepare copper solution. Weigh 0.1821 g of copper nitrate and dilute it in 10 mL of tap water.

Use: A solution was prepared by dissolving copper nitrate (0.1821 g) in tap water (10 mL).

Further subdivide into

  • Materials—sources and purity of reagents used
  • Preparation of compounds—with the procedure and summary of characterization by NMR, IR, etc.
  • Instrumentation—manufacturer, description of any adaptation, or sample preparation

Tip 2

A quality Materials and Methods section should allow the reader to holistically reproduce what you did in the lab, using what you have written.


Include an outline of your raw data, preferably aided by tables and figures, and main observations.

Tip 3

Don’t include lengthy tables of raw data; instead, simply present the outcomes of your calculations.

Avoid: The following standard concentrations were used to follow X law for the absorbances at the corresponding wavelength (Table).

Use: The standard concentrations were measured at the corresponding wavelengths and the data provided in Table 1.

Figures, Tables, Equations

Explain the objective of each figure, scheme, equation, and table in the Results section. When referring to a figure, table, or equation, use its number in the text.


A plateau was observed at reduced pressures >0.1, as indicated in Table 1.

Indicate every figure, table, and equation with a number. Figures and tables need a number and a descriptive title, and equations usually have a number placed in parentheses at the right margin.


Figure 1. Mass Uptake vs. Reduced Pressure for A

Table 1. Powder Diffraction Data Obtained for A

A = B2                                                                            (1)

Tip 4

“Figure” is much preferred compared to the labels “chart” and “graph.”


  • Analyze your outcomes
  • Comment on the objective of the experiment
  • Explain what the outcomes point to
  • What are the sources of inaccuracy (experimental uncertainty/precision) and limitations?
  • What further experiments could help address any open questions or loose ends?
  • Do the outcomes agree with what others have discovered?
  • Do the outcomes endorse a model or hypothesis?


Avoid: If, for example, we could have used a red and green apple to determine the components, we could have averaged the data and obtained more accurate results.

Use: For example, if data were obtained from both a red and a green apple, the averaged results could provide more representative values.


Summarize your outcomes and discussion with a concise conclusion, phrasing it in terms of the broad-ranging questions addressed in the Introduction. A notable feature of Trinka is the ability to present academic writing concisely.

Tip 5

When testing a hypothesis, you may want to say that the hypothesis was “proved” or “disproved” or was “correct” or “incorrect.”

Remember, you are testing a theory with a procedure that lasts only a handful of hours and depends on only a few trials, which seriously compromises your ability to be certain about the “truth” you see.

Consequently, words such as “supported,” “indicated,” and “suggested” are more suitable to evaluate your hypothesis.

In the next article, we will discuss the scientific conventions and styles used in chemistry articles.

Again, to better understand how these rules and conventions can be incorporated in academic writing, you can try Trinka. This AI-driven writing tool understands subtle subject-specific requirements and enhances your writing with suggestions pertaining to technical spellings, formal tone, style guide preferences, and a lot more. Trinka’s exclusive features are designed make your research paper publication-ready easily!

You might also like
1 Comment
  1. リアルドール says

    Appreciating the hard work you put into your blog and detailed information you present.It’s nice to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’tthe same outdated rehashed material. Fantastic read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.