Teaching & Learning
- Student use of generative AI in coursework is not uniformly allowed or banned university-wide; it is governed by instructor discretion
- Students may use AI tools only when the instructor explicitly authorizes it in writing, and any unauthorized use is treated as academic dishonesty
Using electronic programs, applications, websites, or other software for creating text, images, artworks, computer code, or any other content, whether in whole or in part, in order to complete an assignment, project, or other course-related work, unless specifically authorized by the instructor in writing. Such electronic tools include, but are not limited to, generative artificial intelligence (AI) services and applications.
- The sources do not provide an AI-specific rule for exams, quizzes, or formal assessments
- The only explicit AI rule is the broader misconduct provision covering course-related work unless the instructor authorizes use in writing
Using electronic programs, applications, websites, or other software for creating text, images, artworks, computer code, or any other content, whether in whole or in part, in order to complete an assignment, project, or other course-related work, unless specifically authorized by the instructor in writing. Such electronic tools include, but are not limited to, generative artificial intelligence (AI) services and applications.
- AI-assisted code generation for student coursework is subject to instructor discretion
- The policy explicitly includes computer code among the content students may not generate with AI for course work unless the instructor has specifically authorized it in writing
Using electronic programs, applications, websites, or other software for creating text, images, artworks, computer code, or any other content, whether in whole or in part, in order to complete an assignment, project, or other course-related work, unless specifically authorized by the instructor in writing. Such electronic tools include, but are not limited to, generative artificial intelligence (AI) services and applications.
Research
Academic Integrity
- The sources do not state a disclosure or citation method for permitted AI use
- They only state that AI use for course-related work requires prior written authorization from the instructor
Using electronic programs, applications, websites, or other software for creating text, images, artworks, computer code, or any other content, whether in whole or in part, in order to complete an assignment, project, or other course-related work, unless specifically authorized by the instructor in writing. Such electronic tools include, but are not limited to, generative artificial intelligence (AI) services and applications.
- Unauthorized AI use is treated as academic dishonesty and is subject to the university's student conduct process and sanctions
- The policy does not mention AI detection tools, but it does define prohibited AI-enabled conduct and states that violations may lead to penalties up to suspension or expulsion
Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to: cheating, plagiarism, and every other form of dishonest behavior and/or fabrication of information with the intent to deceive for the purpose of improving a grade or obtaining course credit.
Using electronic programs, applications, websites, or other software for creating text, images, artworks, computer code, or any other content, whether in whole or in part, in order to complete an assignment, project, or other course-related work, unless specifically authorized by the instructor in writing. Such electronic tools include, but are not limited to, generative artificial intelligence (AI) services and applications.
Violations of these standards may result in disciplinary sanctions up to and including suspension or expulsion from the university.
Institutional & Administrative
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About Academy of Art College's AI Policies
Academy of Art College has defined AI policies in 5 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 42%.
The sources do not state a disclosure or citation method for permitted AI use. They only state that AI use for course-related work requires prior written authorization from the instructor.
Unauthorized AI use is treated as academic dishonesty and is subject to the university's student conduct process and sanctions. The policy does not mention AI detection tools, but it does define prohibited AI-enabled conduct and states that violations may lead to penalties up to suspension or expulsion.
No explicit data protection or approved AI platform policy is currently defined in the available policy sources.