Teaching & Learning
- The university does not define an AI-specific rule for coursework or assignments
- It does require students to be honest in completing assignments, prohibits plagiarism and other cheating, and treats use of uncited material or downloading material from cheating websites as impermissible
Students are expected to be honest in fulfilling all academic requirements and assignments. This pertains to examinations, themes, book critiques, reading reports, etc.
Therefore, any form of cheating or academic dishonesty is unfit to basic Christian discipleship and cannot be tolerated. Anyone cheating on a test or assignment may receive an “F” for the assignment or for the course and potentially face disciplinary action by the school.
Plagiarism, the use of another’s uncited material as one’s own, is impermissible.
It further applies to downloading material from websites which are designed to aid in cheating on essays, term papers and dissertations.
- The university does not define an AI-specific exam policy
- It requires exams to reflect the student's independent work, forbids bringing course notes and other resources into the testing room, and says tests are compromised if persons, materials, or technologies affect results
Whatever the testing method may be, all students must realize that exams must reflect the independent work and expertise of the student being tested.
Course notes and other resources may not be brought into the testing room. Testing requires academic honesty and a student’s honor is at stake if the testing situation is compromised in any fashion by having persons present or materials or technologies in use which impact the results of the test.
Research
- The university does not define an AI-specific policy for research writing or manuscript preparation
- Its academic integrity rules prohibit plagiarism, require proper attribution, and specifically prohibit downloading material from websites designed to aid cheating on essays, term papers, and dissertations
Plagiarism, the use of another’s uncited material as one’s own, is impermissible.
This also specifically applies to the use of other people’s essays, research papers, sermons and ceremonies from books, tapes, magazines, etc. without proper attribution. It further applies to downloading material from websites which are designed to aid in cheating on essays, term papers and dissertations.
- The university does not define an AI-specific research ethics rule
- It states that college IT resources are designated for research purposes and that users must still comply with existing policies on academic dishonesty and plagiarism
This AUP is intended to supplement College Policy and does not release users from compliance with any existing policies that address ethical issues such as harassment, academic dishonesty, and plagiarism.
College-provided IT resources are primarily designated for instructional, research, or administrative purposes.
Academic Integrity
- The university does not define AI disclosure or citation requirements
- It does require attribution for others' work and states that using another's uncited material as one's own is impermissible
Plagiarism, the use of another’s uncited material as one’s own, is impermissible.
This also specifically applies to the use of other people’s essays, research papers, sermons and ceremonies from books, tapes, magazines, etc. without proper attribution.
- The university does not mention AI detection tools
- For academic dishonesty, it allows an F on the assignment or course, possible disciplinary action, bars withdrawal while an investigation is ongoing, and states the final course grade is determined by the faculty member if guilt is established
Anyone cheating on a test or assignment may receive an “F” for the assignment or for the course and potentially face disciplinary action by the school.
A student will not be allowed to withdraw from a course if he/she is under investigation for academic dishonesty. In the event that the student is determined guilty of academic dishonesty, then the student will not be allowed to withdraw from the course and will receive the grade determined by the faculty member.
A student will not be allowed to withdraw from a course if he/she is under investigation for academic dishonesty. If the student is determined guilty for academic dishonesty, then the student will not be allowed to withdraw from the course and will receive a grade determined by the faculty member, either an “F” for the assignment and/or an “F” for the course. Dishonesty could result in further disciplinary action.
Institutional & Administrative
- The university does not define approved AI platforms or AI-specific data-entry rules
- It does have a general technology use policy covering all users, requiring compliance with laws and college policies, stating there is no expectation of privacy on college IT resources, allowing monitoring and access by authorized personnel, and prohibiting unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, or possession of data and systems
This policy applies to anyone who uses the College’s information technology (IT) resources.
Access to and use of AIC IT resources and the Internet shall comply with federal laws, the laws of the State of Arizona, and the policies and procedures of the College.
Users should not assume or expect any right of privacy with respect to the College’s IT resources.
Although the College does not routinely monitor the communication of its employees or students, system administrators or other authorized college personnel may access or examine files or accounts that are suspected of unauthorized use or misuse, that have been corrupted or damaged, or that may threaten the integrity of the College’s computer systems.
It is a violation of this policy to:
1. Intentionally and without authorization, access, modify, damage, destroy, copy, disclose, print, or take possession of all or part of any computer, computer system, network, software, data file, program, database, or any other College IT resource.
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About American Indian College of the Assemblies of God's AI Policies
American Indian College of the Assemblies of God has defined AI policies in 7 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 58%.
The university does not define AI disclosure or citation requirements. It does require attribution for others' work and states that using another's uncited material as one's own is impermissible.
The university does not mention AI detection tools. For academic dishonesty, it allows an F on the assignment or course, possible disciplinary action, bars withdrawal while an investigation is ongoing, and states the final course grade is determined by the faculty member if guilt is established.
The university does not define approved AI platforms or AI-specific data-entry rules. It does have a general technology use policy covering all users, requiring compliance with laws and college policies, stating there is no expectation of privacy on college IT resources, allowing monitoring and access by authorized personnel, and prohibiting unauthorized access, disclosure, copying, or possession of data and systems.