Anderson University AI Policy

This scale of uses is generally meant to reference use of Gen AI in assignments that require something to be submitted for a grade.

Failure to acknowledge the use of Gen AI in a product submitted for a grade may violate Anderson University’s Academic Integrity policy.

● the unapproved use of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, image or code generators) to produce

content submitted as one’s own work, including essays, problem sets, programming code,

or artistic work, without proper citation or explicit instructor permission;

As a guiding principle, students should expect that using AI is not permitted to complete graded coursework.

The only time AI is acceptable is if the instructor explicitly allows it.

Activities:

technology-free

discussions, reflective

writing, in-class work;

completing quizzes,

exams or oral exams.

You may not use

Generative AI for such

assignment or

activities.

• To turn in assignments that are the result of another’s work (fabrication) including artificial

intelligence programs

• Duplicating and disbursing in any format copyrighted national certification exam questions or

any exams, or quizzes utilized by the nursing program

It is not applicable to other

academic activities for which AI could be useful, such as translations, memorization/tutoring, and self-quizzing or testing one’s knowledge of terms and concepts.

Introduced in AU 101 and reinforced across general education and upper-level courses, AI becomes a consistent part of the student experience—offering opportunity, flexibility, and choice throughout all four years.

* An adaptive AI study tutor that quizzes students, increases difficulty, and adjusts tone to enhance engagement

● the unapproved use of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, image or code generators) to produce

content submitted as one’s own work, including essays, problem sets, programming code,

or artistic work, without proper citation or explicit instructor permission;

Acknowledging the use of AI tools in research is crucial for transparency and integrity.

The use of artificial intelligence adds a new dimension to the research process, influencing how information is generated and interpreted.

Clearly stating the involvement of AI not only upholds academic honesty but also allows your peers and educators to understand the unique methodology, contributing to an open and collaborative academic culture.

* A dissertation-writing tutor bot supporting advanced research and scholarly writing

AI can be useful for

researching info.,

definitions, and

concepts, or for

finding answers.

You must verify the

validity of any

seemingly factual info.

generated by AI.

Employers are already seeking graduates who are fluent in AI-assisted writing, content creation and data analysis.

Acknowledging the use of AI tools in research is crucial for transparency and integrity.

1. Academic Integrity

a. Have I properly attributed my use of Gen AI

tools in my work? Is the work I create with the

assistance of Gen AI, and how I present such

products, consistent with AU’s Honor Code

Failure to acknowledge the use of Gen AI in a product submitted for a grade may violate Anderson University’s Academic Integrity policy.

Acknowledging the use of AI tools in research is crucial for transparency and integrity.

The incorporation of AI into your assignments necessitates a clear acknowledgment of their use.

● the unapproved use of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, image or code generators) to produce

content submitted as one’s own work, including essays, problem sets, programming code,

or artistic work, without proper citation or explicit instructor permission;

When AI is explicitly permitted and used

as a tool in the completion of an assignment, students must cite the AI technology used.

Anderson University supports and promotes academic honesty and personal integrity and regards cheating,

plagiarism, and all other forms of academic dishonesty as serious offenses against the university community.

● the unapproved use of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, image or code generators) to produce

content submitted as one’s own work, including essays, problem sets, programming code,

or artistic work, without proper citation or explicit instructor permission;

Submitting an assignment that has been created by one or more AI tools and presenting yourself as the author

or creator is unethical and deceptive, and clearly violates AU’s Academic Integrity Policy under item 5, II.B.:

Fabrication.

At Anderson University, we will:

• Equip faculty with opportunities to integrate meaningful AI conversations, tools, activities, or assignments into our

students’ coursework and academic programs.

BoodleBox to be Available Free for Faculty, Staff and Student Use

Anderson University, as part of its strategic focus on the ethical implementation of Artificial Intelligence, has deployed BoodleBox, a campus-wide suite of free-to-use AI tools, soon to be available to all faculty, staff and students.

Visit the Artificial Intelligence Resource Hub in Canvas: Instructor of Record Responsibilities course

To ensure fairness, privacy, and academic integrity, AU provides campus-wide access to BoodleBox, a secure AI platform.

Security: Prompts and data entered by AU members are protected in a closed, walled-garden environment

2. Data Privacy and Confidentiality - assessment of specific tools

a. What happens to the information I submit to a

resource that utilized Gen AI? How is the

information I input used after it generates the

results of my work with Gen AI?

b. Who has access to my personal information?

c. Is my data only contained within the model I

use, or is it transferred or sold to other models

or entities?

As an internationally recognized* higher education leader in innovative educational technology, Anderson University

acknowledges its responsibility to equip students to successfully engage in a world context increasingly shaped by

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies.

Anderson University embraces the opportunities Artificial Intelligence presents,

modeling responsible use while upholding standards of premier academic integrity in keeping with the University’s core

Christian values and exceptional academic rigor.

“In keeping with our culture of innovation, Anderson University determined that our entire campus (all faculty, staff, and students) is best served with a unified approach to using AI tools,” said Anderson University Provost Dr. Ryan Neal.

Last year, Professor Nathan Cox, AU Associate Provost and Director of AU’s Center for Learning and Teaching Excellence, was tasked with leading a committee on the evolving ethical use of AI in teaching and learning at Anderson University as they participated in a year-long institute on AI, Pedagogy and the Curriculum.