Andrew College AI Policy

GeorgiaPrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
67%8 of 12
Varies by Course
Coursework
AI use in coursework is determined at the instructor level. Each course may have different rules about AI tools.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Andrew College has defined AI policies across 8 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. AI use in coursework is addressed on a case-by-case basis, with policies set at the instructor level. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
Instructor DiscretionViolations Enforced
  • The available sources only state general academic integrity expectations against cheating and plagiarism
  • The university does not define any policy that specifically addresses student use of AI tools for completing coursework or graded assignments

not defined

U2Examinations & Assessments
General Policy Applies
  • The provided sources do not contain AI-specific exam rules
  • The university does not define any policy that specifically addresses AI use during examinations, quizzes, tests, or other formal assessments

not defined

U3Learning & Study Assistance
📋
No policy defined yet
U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Review Board InvolvedEthics Framework Active
  • The university does not define any AI-specific research ethics or integrity rules in the provided sources
  • The materials reviewed do not mention AI in connection with grant proposals, IRB applications, ethics declarations, or research integrity standards

not defined

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • No source states how students or researchers must acknowledge AI use
  • The university does not define any AI-specific disclosure, attribution, or citation requirement in the provided sources

not defined

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedPenalties Defined
  • The university does not define any AI-specific detection or enforcement policy
  • The provided sources do not mention AI detection tools or penalties specifically tied to undisclosed AI use

not defined

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff Guidelines
  • The university does not define any policy for faculty or staff use of AI in grading, feedback, lesson planning, recommendations, or administrative communications in the provided sources

not defined

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools ListedData Protection ActiveUnapproved AI Blocked
  • The university does not define any AI-specific data protection rules, approved AI platforms, or prohibited AI systems in the provided sources

not defined

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • The university does not define any overarching AI governance framework, strategy, committee, or roadmap in the provided sources

not defined

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Andrew College's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai