Teaching & Learning
- Baker College treats submitting AI-generated work as one’s own as academic misconduct
- The library guidance allows AI tools to support brainstorming, outlining, revision, and drafting help, but students remain responsible for the final submission and must follow instructor and assignment rules
Plagiarism shall be understood to mean the appropriation and use of another person's ideas and writings as one's own. This includes all electronic sources, including use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated text, images, code, and graphics, even when modified or rephrased.
AI tools can be helpful for brainstorming, organizing ideas, getting feedback on writing, and more. However, using AI-generated content without proper attribution can be considered plagiarism or academic misconduct.
These tools can support your writing process, but they should not replace your own critical thinking or your instructor's specific assignment requirements.
- No exam-specific permission or prohibition for AI use is explicitly defined in the provided sources
- Baker College does not state a standalone AI rule for exams, but its academic integrity rules apply to all submitted work and prohibit representing AI-generated material as one’s own
When students submit their own work for academic evaluation, they are indicating that the work is their own and that all the content was generated and composed by the student, except for material that has been appropriately acknowledged, quoted and cited.
Plagiarism shall be understood to mean the appropriation and use of another person's ideas and writings as one's own. This includes all electronic sources, including use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated text, images, code, and graphics, even when modified or rephrased.
- The guidance frames AI as assistive rather than a substitute for student effort
- Baker College permits students to use AI as a learning support tool for understanding concepts, generating study help, and improving their work, so long as it does not replace their own thinking and complies with assignment expectations
AI tools can be helpful for brainstorming, organizing ideas, getting feedback on writing, and more.
These tools can support your writing process, but they should not replace your own critical thinking or your instructor's specific assignment requirements.
Use AI ethically and transparently, especially when it contributes directly to your academic work.
- Baker College explicitly includes AI-generated code within its plagiarism policy
- Submitting AI-generated code as one’s own is treated as plagiarism, even if the code has been modified or rephrased
Plagiarism shall be understood to mean the appropriation and use of another person's ideas and writings as one's own. This includes all electronic sources, including use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated text, images, code, and graphics, even when modified or rephrased.
Research
- Baker College does not provide a research-specific AI writing policy in the supplied materials
- The available academic integrity language generally prohibits presenting AI-generated text as one’s own without acknowledgment, but no separate manuscript or thesis/dissertation rule is explicitly defined
When students submit their own work for academic evaluation, they are indicating that the work is their own and that all the content was generated and composed by the student, except for material that has been appropriately acknowledged, quoted and cited.
Plagiarism shall be understood to mean the appropriation and use of another person's ideas and writings as one's own. This includes all electronic sources, including use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated text, images, code, and graphics, even when modified or rephrased.
- No explicit research-data AI rule is stated
- The university’s provided sources do not define an AI policy for research data collection, analysis, synthetic data generation, or interpretation of results
not defined
- No direct research-ethics AI policy is defined in the supplied text
- The provided Baker College sources do not explicitly state AI requirements for grant proposals, IRB applications, ethics disclosures, or research-integrity review processes
not defined
Academic Integrity
- Baker College requires acknowledgment and citation when material is not the student’s own, including AI-generated content
- Its library guidance specifically instructs students to cite AI use, be transparent, verify AI outputs, and follow APA guidance when AI contributes to academic work
When students submit their own work for academic evaluation, they are indicating that the work is their own and that all the content was generated and composed by the student, except for material that has been appropriately acknowledged, quoted and cited.
AI tools can be helpful for brainstorming, organizing ideas, getting feedback on writing, and more. However, using AI-generated content without proper attribution can be considered plagiarism or academic misconduct.
If your instructor allows it, cite AI-generated content according to APA guidelines.
Use AI ethically and transparently, especially when it contributes directly to your academic work.
- Baker College enforces AI-related misconduct through its academic integrity process by classifying undisclosed AI-generated work as plagiarism
- The provided sources do not state a university position on AI detection tools, but they do specify that academic integrity violations can result in sanctions up to expulsion
Plagiarism shall be understood to mean the appropriation and use of another person's ideas and writings as one's own. This includes all electronic sources, including use of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-generated text, images, code, and graphics, even when modified or rephrased.
Violations of this policy may result in penalties up to and including expulsion from Baker College.
Institutional & Administrative
- No explicit faculty/staff AI-use policy is stated in the provided text
- The supplied sources do not define faculty or staff rules for using AI in grading, feedback, lesson planning, recommendation letters, or administrative communication
not defined
- The sources establish general controls on confidential information and unauthorized software use rather than a dedicated AI platform policy
- Baker College requires members of the college community to protect institutional data and use software in compliance with licensing and security requirements, but the provided materials do not name approved AI platforms or give AI-specific data-entry rules
Employees and students are expected to respect and protect the privacy of the data and information to which they have access as a result of their employment or enrollment at Baker College.
Users must not access, copy, store, or transmit confidential or sensitive institutional data except as authorized and necessary for legitimate educational or business purposes.
The College prohibits the installation or use of unauthorized software on institutional devices or networks.
- No explicit institutional AI governance policy is defined in the provided text
- Baker College provides library guidance and instructional support resources about generative AI, but the supplied sources do not state a formal university-wide AI governance framework, committee structure, or strategic roadmap
Generative AI at Baker College
This guide is intended to help Baker students, faculty, and staff understand what generative AI is, how it can support learning and work, and how to use it responsibly and ethically in academic settings.
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About Baker College of Flint's AI Policies
Baker College of Flint has defined AI policies in 12 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 100%.
Baker College requires acknowledgment and citation when material is not the student’s own, including AI-generated content. Its library guidance specifically instructs students to cite AI use, be transparent, verify AI outputs, and follow APA guidance when AI contributes to academic work.
Baker College enforces AI-related misconduct through its academic integrity process by classifying undisclosed AI-generated work as plagiarism. The provided sources do not state a university position on AI detection tools, but they do specify that academic integrity violations can result in sanctions up to expulsion.
Baker College requires members of the college community to protect institutional data and use software in compliance with licensing and security requirements, but the provided materials do not name approved AI platforms or give AI-specific data-entry rules. The sources establish general controls on confidential information and unauthorized software use rather than a dedicated AI platform policy.