Berry College has defined AI policies across 8 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.
Students may not use arFficial intelligence (AI) tools or applicaFons during the Program unless such use is explicitly permijed in the applicable course syllabus and assignment instrucFons. AI tools, including but not limited to Copilot and DALL-E, may be incorporated into coursework only when their use aligns with specific learning objecFves. When AI use is permijed, students will be provided with guidelines for appropriate use, documentaFon, and ajribuFon. Any unauthorized use of AI tools is a violaFon of the Berry PA Program Code of Conduct and will be addressed through the BCPA Student Progression Commijee.
In addiFon, students enrolled in the Physician Associate Program are strictly prohibited from uploading, sharing, or otherwise inpusng any faculty-created or programmaFc materials—including but not limited to lectures, assignments, assessments, presentaFons, handouts, rubrics, or other instrucFonal content— into any arFficial intelligence plaUorm, engine, or related tool.
Cheating: using or providing unauthorized information or aids on any examination or other graded assignment; altering a graded work prior to its return to a faculty member; doing another’s work or allowing another person to do one’s work, and submitting it for grading;
Students may not use arFficial intelligence (AI) tools or applicaFons during the Program unless such use is explicitly permijed in the applicable course syllabus and assignment instrucFons.
Any unauthorized use of AI tools is a violaFon of the Berry PA Program Code of Conduct and will be addressed through the BCPA Student Progression Commijee.
Students may not use arFficial intelligence (AI) tools or applicaFons during the Program unless such use is explicitly permijed in the applicable course syllabus and assignment instrucFons. AI tools, including but not limited to Copilot and DALL-E, may be incorporated into coursework only when their use aligns with specific learning objecFves. When AI use is permijed, students will be provided with guidelines for appropriate use, documentaFon, and ajribuFon. Any unauthorized use of AI tools is a violaFon of the Berry PA Program Code of Conduct and will be addressed through the BCPA Student Progression Commijee.
When AI use is permijed, students will be provided with guidelines for appropriate use, documentaFon, and ajribuFon.
Applicants are required to submit a personal statement in CASPA at the Fme of applicaFon. Personal statements will be reviewed holisFcally and compared to the applicant pool. AI-generated personal statements will not be accepted, whether in part or whole.
In the event a faculty member suspects an instance of academic dishonesty, the faculty member should:
* Discuss the suspected infraction directly with the student(s) involved.
* Make copies of relevant materials before returning them to the student(s) for any approved amendment or revision.
* Discuss the suspected infraction and the documented evidence with the department chair, dean or a colleague if collegial advice is desired.
* Make a decision based on the evidence and determine appropriate sanctions; sanctions may include warning the student, or reducing an assignment, exam, or course grade; if sanctions are imposed, discuss these and the appeals process with the student.
* If a student is found to have violated academic integrity policy, the provost should be notified in writing.
Students seeking to appeal the sanction concerning academic integrity may appeal to a subcommittee consisting of equal numbers of faculty and students of Academic Council that will be convened by the provost or associate provost.
Any unauthorized use of AI tools is a violaFon of the Berry PA Program Code of Conduct and will be addressed through the BCPA Student Progression Commijee.
CheaFng will not be tolerated and is in violaFon of the Berry PA Program Code Conduct and Technical Standards. Students caught cheaFng will receive a zero “0%” on the assignment or assessment on which they cheated. Students will then be immediately referred to the Student Progression Commijee for further review and consequences up to and including expulsion.
Uploading or storing confidential Berry data or documents in an unauthorized location. This includes but is not limited to personal file storing accounts like Dropbox or Google Drive, and AI services that have not been authorized.
Uploading or storing confidential Berry data or documents in an unauthorized location. This includes but is not limited to personal file storing accounts like Dropbox or Google Drive, and AI services that have not been authorized.
Berry College is implementing Data Sensitivity Levels for documents, emails, Teams discussions and analytics data sets. These labels will allow the college to more precisely manage the protection of sensitive, private and controlled information.
The goal is to equip those who are working with these types of data and documents with a standardized measure of sensitivity to better guide proper storage and distribution and reduce the risk of improper disclosure of confidential or sensitive information.
Secret
Distributing or Sharing:
Requires prior approval from steward
Downloading or Storing:
Approved, highly secure systems
High
Distributing or Sharing:
Requires prior approval from steward
Downloading or Storing:
Approved systems
Berry College is implementing Data Sensitivity Levels for documents, emails, Teams discussions and analytics data sets. These labels will allow the college to more precisely manage the protection of sensitive, private and controlled information.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Berry College has defined AI policies in 8 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 67%.
Berry College does not set a general institution-wide AI disclosure rule in the provided sources. In the Physician Associate Program, when AI use is allowed, students are to receive guidelines covering documentation and attribution. The same handbook also states that AI-generated personal statements are not accepted for admission, whether in part or whole.
Berry College's general academic integrity process allows faculty to investigate suspected dishonesty, determine sanctions, and notify the provost if a violation is found. Sanctions may include warning the student or reducing assignment, exam, or course grades, and students may appeal. In the Physician Associate Program, unauthorized AI use is handled as a code-of-conduct violation through the Student Progression Committee, and cheating can lead to a zero on the work and further consequences up to expulsion.
Berry College prohibits uploading or storing confidential Berry data or documents in unauthorized AI services. Its data sensitivity framework requires prior approval from a steward for sharing Secret and High data, restricts such data to approved systems, and states that the policy is intended to guide proper storage and distribution and reduce improper disclosure. The sources also state that the college is implementing data sensitivity labels for documents, emails, Teams discussions, and analytics data sets.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai