Bournemouth University AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
100%12 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Active
Detection
The university has mechanisms in place to detect unauthorized AI use.
Active
Governance
The university has established AI governance at the institutional level.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Bournemouth University has defined AI policies across 12 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI Prohibited
  • Submitting AI-generated work as if it were a student's own work is treated as an academic offence, and misuse can include using AI to generate all or part of an assignment
  • For coursework and other submitted assessments, AI use is not banned outright across the university, but students must follow assignment-specific instructions and be transparent when AI has been used

Please ensure that if you have used an AI tool, where permitted, in support of your learning and have included AI generated content in your work, your use of AI generated content should be made apparent and clearly acknowledged.

We support the use of AI where it is ethically used. You should always check with your Unit Leader whether the use of AI generated content in your assignment is acceptable and if so to what extent and if there are any guidance requirements.

The use of an AI generator such as ChatGPT to complete an assignment, wholly or partially, where the use of AI generated content has not been expressly permitted by your tutor or Unit Leader, is an academic offence, regardless of whether this is acknowledged or not

AI generators can only be used where your tutor or unit leader has expressly stated that they can be used in relation to your assignment.

Presenting work for assessment generated by artificial intelligence (AI), as if it were your own work, where explicit permission has not been given by your tutor/ unit leader, or where you use the generated text within your own work and this has not been made clear through explicit acknowledgement.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in Exams
  • For exams and formal assessments, AI use is prohibited unless the exam or assessment instructions expressly allow it
  • The university states that this applies to all assessment formats, including practical work, coursework, in-person exams, and online exams

Whether or not you're using AI to support your assignment or assessment, this should be acknowledged (where this is permitted).

If the use of AI is not permitted by your lecturer or tutor, and you use AI to generate your answer, this is considered an academic offence.

Importantly, these changes apply to all forms of assessments, including practical assessments, coursework, in person examinations and online examinations. So, if you're taking an examination and the use of AI is not expressly permitted, you should not use this in any way.

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for StudyVerification Advised
  • The university supports AI use for learning support when used ethically
  • Students may use AI tools to help with understanding, checking, planning, and skill development, but they are expected to verify outputs carefully and remain responsible for the final work

Used ethically, AI tools can support your learning. For example, it can be used in the following ways:

simplify complex topics, helping students to understand challenging concepts quickly and ask questions to build a greater understanding

offer examples of good grammar, sentence structure and the flow of text, enabling students to improve their writing and communication skills

provide examples of how to tackle a problem or structure a response, supporting students in developing their own answers and ideas.

provide feedback on writing or practice quizzes, to help identify areas for improvement before submitting coursework or taking exams.

Students should be aware that there are issues and limitations with AI generated content, so should use it with caution and with academic integrity. This includes understanding that:

AI may not always provide accurate, reliable or up-to-date information.

AI often generates responses by pulling content from third-party sources, without properly citing or acknowledging where it came from.

Students remain fully responsible for the work they submit, even if they use AI tools to support their learning.

They should therefore always:

check any content generated by AI for accuracy, relevance and potential bias.

make sure any sources or references suggested by AI are genuine and suitable for academic use.

understand and be able to explain any ideas or wording included in their work, even if AI helped produce them.

U4Code Generation & Programming
AI Coding AllowedAttribution Required
  • The university does not provide a separate coding-specific rule, but programming work falls under the same assignment rules as other assessed work
  • AI tools for code generation are only allowed when the tutor or unit leader has expressly permitted them for that assignment, and AI-assisted content must be acknowledged where permitted

AI generators can only be used where your tutor or unit leader has expressly stated that they can be used in relation to your assignment.

Please ensure that if you have used an AI tool, where permitted, in support of your learning and have included AI generated content in your work, your use of AI generated content should be made apparent and clearly acknowledged.

🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
Editing-Level Use Allowed
  • Postgraduate researchers may use AI only for proofreading, refining language, or improving readability, and remain fully responsible for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of the work
  • For research degree writing, the university permits limited AI-assisted editing support but prohibits using generative AI to create scholarly content or substitute for the candidate's own intellectual contribution

For the avoidance of doubt, a candidate may utilise a proof-reader or use a digital support tool to proofread syntax, spelling and grammar, but in all cases, this must be in line with University policy and the University’s guidance on the use of AI generated content.

BU recognises that the use of AI in doctoral research is a nuanced and evolving issue. AI tools may support some aspects of the research process, particularly around language refinement or accessibility. However, the use of Generative AI to produce substantive intellectual content, such as generating sections of a literature review, discussion or interpretation, is not permitted where it replaces or obscures the candidate’s own original contribution.

PGRs may use AI to support proofreading, improve readability and identify language issues, but the final submitted work must remain their own. Responsibility for the originality, accuracy and integrity of the thesis rests entirely with the candidate.

U6Research Data & Analysis
AI Analysis Permitted
  • No explicit operational policy for these activities is defined in the supplied materials
  • The university acknowledges AI may support some research processes, but the provided sources do not set a specific university rule for using AI in data collection, data analysis, statistical processing, synthetic data generation, or interpretation of results

not defined

U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Ethics Framework Active
  • The university treats the use of generative AI in research as an integrity issue requiring caution, transparency, and researcher accountability
  • Researchers are expected to disclose AI use where it materially contributes to academic output, and they must not enter confidential, personal, sensitive, or unpublished research information into public AI tools unless institutional approval and safeguards are in place

Researchers remain fully accountable for all submitted work, including any content informed or assisted by AI. The use of AI should never compromise ethical standards, data protection, confidentiality or the originality of academic work.

Any use of AI that materially contributes to academic output should be acknowledged appropriately. This aligns with emerging best practice and helps maintain transparency and trust in research.

Researchers and students should not upload confidential, personal or sensitive information to publicly available AI platforms. This includes unpublished research data, participant information and any data covered by GDPR or confidentiality agreements, unless there is a secure, institutionally approved environment and explicit permission in place.

Throughout the project, students should think carefully about whether they are using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in any aspect of their work. Some tools, like transcription software or writing support programs, may involve AI features and this should be acknowledged where relevant. As a student researcher, you remain fully responsible for the content of your dissertation, project or report. You must make sure that anything generated or supported by AI is accurate, appropriate and ethically used.

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure Mandatory
  • Disclosure of AI use is required when AI-generated content is included in submitted work and such use is permitted
  • Students must clearly acknowledge AI-generated content and, where course guidance allows AI, may need to include the tool used, date accessed, prompt, and output excerpts in an appendix

Please ensure that if you have used an AI tool, where permitted, in support of your learning and have included AI generated content in your work, your use of AI generated content should be made apparent and clearly acknowledged.

If AI generated content is permitted by your tutor or unit leader, and you are required to use BU Harvard referencing, this should be acknowledged in your assignment. Please refer to guidance from your tutor or unit leader as to how to do this or the following guidance from Cite Them Right Online

A declaration should be added to your work to explain the use of AI generated content and where this has been used. For example "Sections of this assignment have been generated with the assistance of an AI text generator (ChatGPT, 13/7/2023 3.5) and modified by me after several revisions. The prompts used and the output generated can be found in Appendix 1”.

For example, if students use AI to generate part of an assignment, they might include:

what tool was used

the date it was accessed

a copy of the prompt(s)

a transcript or summary of the response

this could be in an appendix or other format required by the unit.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Enforcement Defined
  • Undisclosed or unauthorized AI use is enforced through the university's academic offences framework
  • The university states that using AI where not expressly permitted is an academic offence, and presenting AI-generated work as one's own falls within plagiarism-type misconduct addressed under formal academic offence procedures

The use of an AI generator such as ChatGPT to complete an assignment, wholly or partially, where the use of AI generated content has not been expressly permitted by your tutor or Unit Leader, is an academic offence, regardless of whether this is acknowledged or not

Presenting work for assessment generated by artificial intelligence (AI), as if it were your own work, where explicit permission has not been given by your tutor/ unit leader, or where you use the generated text within your own work and this has not been made clear through explicit acknowledgement.

1.1 This policy and procedure is designed to enable suspected academic offences to be dealt with fairly, consistently and in a timely manner.

2.1 An academic offence is an action or behaviour likely to give a student an unfair advantage in assessment. The following is a non-exhaustive list of conduct that may amount to an academic offence under this policy:

(i) plagiarism, that is, the representation of another person’s work, whether in words, images, sounds or data, including concepts, theories, ideas, inventions and research findings, as the student’s own; this includes plagiarism in assessed oral presentations

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff Guidelines
  • The university provides staff-facing AI guidance and permits staff use of AI tools for work support, subject to human oversight, transparency, and role-based judgment
  • Staff are told they remain responsible for outputs, should review AI-generated material critically, and should be especially cautious when using AI in communication, feedback, or advice affecting students or colleagues

As staff, you may already be using AI tools to support aspects of your work, such as drafting documents, summarising information, brainstorming ideas or streamlining repetitive tasks. These tools can be helpful, but it is important to use them responsibly and with care.

You are ultimately responsible for any content or decisions informed by AI. This means you must:

review outputs critically for accuracy, relevance and appropriateness

consider whether AI-generated content reflects BU values and professional standards

avoid relying on AI in situations that require personal, academic or pastoral judgement without appropriate oversight.

Think carefully before using AI to draft communications, provide feedback or offer advice that affects students or colleagues. AI-generated content should always be reviewed by a human and adapted where necessary.

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools ListedData Protection ActiveUnapproved AI Blocked
  • The university restricts the use of public AI systems with sensitive information and requires compliance with data protection, confidentiality, and cybersecurity rules
  • Staff and students must not upload confidential, personal, commercially sensitive, or unpublished material to public AI tools unless a secure, institutionally approved environment and explicit permission are in place

The use of AI should never compromise ethical standards, data protection, confidentiality or the originality of academic work.

Researchers and students should not upload confidential, personal or sensitive information to publicly available AI platforms. This includes unpublished research data, participant information and any data covered by GDPR or confidentiality agreements, unless there is a secure, institutionally approved environment and explicit permission in place.

You should not enter confidential, personal, commercially sensitive or otherwise restricted university information into public AI tools unless you are certain this is permitted under BU guidance. This includes:

student or staff personal data

assessment materials before release

research data or findings not yet published

internal reports, business plans or legal content

any information covered by confidentiality agreements or data protection legislation.

Using a public AI tool means you may lose control over how data is stored, processed or reused. Always check whether a tool has been approved for use, and whether there is guidance from your faculty, professional service or IT.

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Addressed
  • The university's AI governance approach centers on ethical use, academic integrity, human responsibility, and localized guidance
  • The institution maintains a dedicated Generative AI Hub to disseminate university-wide guidance on the use of artificial intelligence

We support the use of AI where it is ethically used.

At BU, we encourage the ethical and informed use of AI to support learning, teaching, research and professional practice. AI tools are becoming increasingly common across higher education and can offer real benefits when used appropriately.

Used well, AI can help improve efficiency, support creativity and enhance understanding. But it also raises important questions around accuracy, authorship, bias, privacy and accountability.

Generative Artificial Intelligence Hub

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Bournemouth University's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai