Catholic University of Avila AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
42%5 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Not Defined
Governance
No formal AI governance structure or strategy has been published.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Catholic University of Avila has defined AI policies across 5 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, research ethics.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI ProhibitedAttribution RequiredViolations Enforced
  • In some subjects, AI use in assignments is prohibited and detected use receives a zero or other grade penalty
  • The university does not set a single institution-wide rule in the provided sources; course-level policies vary
  • In at least one course, AI use is partly prohibited for some cases and required for other cases, with unauthorized or undisclosed use treated as an integrity violation

No se permite el uso de inteligencia artificial en la realización de ninguno de los trabajos, por lo que aquellos trabajos en que se detecte su uso obtendrán una nota de 0.

La detección de plagio, incluido el autoplagio, y/o uso de Inteligencia Artificial, puede suponer la bajada de la calificación o incluso el suspenso de la evaluación continua.

Caso tradicional. Donde el grupo de alumnos debe resolver el caso usando el material proporcionado por el profesor en la asignatura. En este tipo de casos no se puede usar IA generativa. Si detecta, será puntuado con 0; y si se repite este comportamiento dará lugar a la pérdida de la evaluación continua (Casos+TO+Participación y asistencia).

Caso uso de IA. Donde el grupo de alumnos deberá obligatoriamente resolver el caso usando IA generativa. En este supuesto sí está permitido su uso.

U2Examinations & Assessments
📋
No policy defined yet
U3Learning & Study Assistance
📋
No policy defined yet
U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
Writing Policy Defined
  • For undergraduate final degree projects, the university indicates that students must complete a responsible declaration on the ethical use of AI tools, authorship of the work, and non-plagiarism
  • The general TFG regulation also states that the work is performed by the student under supervision, but the detailed AI conditions are contained in a separate declaration document not reproduced in the provided source text

1.4. Declaración responsable sobre uso ético de herramientas de inteligencia artificial(IA)/Autoría del trabajo y no plagio

2.1 El TFG supone la realización por parte del estudiante de un proyecto, memoria o estudio bajo la supervisión de uno o más Directores, en el que se integren y desarrollen los contenidos formativos recibidos, capacidades, competencias y habilidades adquiridas durante el periodo de docencia del Grado.

U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
AI Not an AuthorEthics Framework Active
  • The provided sources only identify an AI-related declaration for TFG work tied to authorship and non-plagiarism
  • They do not state policies for AI use in grant proposals, ethics applications, or broader research-integrity processes beyond that TFG context

1.4. Declaración responsable sobre uso ético de herramientas de inteligencia artificial(IA)/Autoría del trabajo y no plagio

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • In the provided sources, disclosure requirements appear in limited contexts
  • That same course guide also treats absence of source citation as an integrity violation
  • The TFG materials require a responsible declaration about ethical AI use, authorship, and non-plagiarism, and one course guide says that generative AI use outside authorized cases and without indicating its use is an academic integrity breach

1.4. Declaración responsable sobre uso ético de herramientas de inteligencia artificial(IA)/Autoría del trabajo y no plagio

Las faltas en la Integridad Académica: ausencia de citación de fuentes, plagios de trabajos ya entregados o de otros compañeros, uso de IA Generativa fuera de los casos autorizados y sin indicar su uso; implicarán la pérdida de la evaluación continua, sin perjuicio de que dicha acción sea puesta en conocimiento del Decano para que adopte las medidas oportunas.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedPenalties Defined
  • The provided sources authorize penalties when AI use is detected or suspected in certain courses
  • The sources mention detection and suspicion but do not identify any specific AI-detection software
  • Depending on the course, detected AI use may receive a zero, reduce the grade, cause failure of continuous assessment, or be referred to the dean

No se permite el uso de inteligencia artificial en la realización de ninguno de los trabajos, por lo que aquellos trabajos en que se detecte su uso obtendrán una nota de 0.

La detección de plagio, incluido el autoplagio, y/o uso de Inteligencia Artificial, puede suponer la bajada de la calificación o incluso el suspenso de la evaluación continua.

Utilización detectada o sospechosa de IA

Caso tradicional. Donde el grupo de alumnos debe resolver el caso usando el material proporcionado por el profesor en la asignatura. En este tipo de casos no se puede usar IA generativa. Si detecta, será puntuado con 0; y si se repite este comportamiento dará lugar a la pérdida de la evaluación continua (Casos+TO+Participación y asistencia).

Las faltas en la Integridad Académica: ausencia de citación de fuentes, plagios de trabajos ya entregados o de otros compañeros, uso de IA Generativa fuera de los casos autorizados y sin indicar su uso; implicarán la pérdida de la evaluación continua, sin perjuicio de que dicha acción sea puesta en conocimiento del Decano para que adopte las medidas oportunas.

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
📋
No policy defined yet
U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
📋
No policy defined yet
U12University AI Governance & Strategy
📋
No policy defined yet

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Catholic University of Avila's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai