Charleston Southern University AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
75%9 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Active
Detection
The university has mechanisms in place to detect unauthorized AI use.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Charleston Southern University has defined AI policies across 9 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI ProhibitedAttribution Required
  • University-wide, AI use on graded coursework is governed by course or assignment rules
  • Using AI contrary to a course or assessment protocol is treated as cheating, and AI use without proper citation is plagiarism
  • In the nursing and MSN handbooks, the default position is that generative AI is prohibited for all assignments unless an instructor explicitly authorizes it for specific assignments; in the PA program, AI is strictly prohibited for graded assignments unless explicitly permitted by the course director, instructor, or faculty

"Cheating" is defined as wrongfully giving, taking, or presenting any information or material borrowed from another source (including the Internet) by a student with the intent of aiding themself or another in academic work. This includes, but is not limited to, a test, examination, presentation, experiment, or any written assignment, which is considered in any way in the determination of the final grade. Using AI in violation of a course or assessment’s stated AI protocol is cheating.

Any use of AI models without proper citation is plagiarism. Students are encouraged to ask their instructor(s) for clarification regarding their academic dishonesty standards. Instructors will include academic dishonesty/integrity standards, including explicit permissible AI use, on their course syllabi and each individual assignment.

To ensure development and mastery of the foundational concepts and skills in this course, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools is prohibited. If you are unsure of this policy or any assignment specific directions, including whether a given technology is considered generative AI, please consult the course instructor prior to using this technology to complete your assignment.

In select assignments (e.g., research papers, annotated bibliographies, case study drafts, presentation outlines), AI tools may be permitted to support work—only if explicitly authorized by the course instructor. This permission will be stated in the syllabus and on the assignment instructions.

Unless otherwise stated in the course syllabus and on assignment instructions, the Master of Science in Nursing Program holds a Level One stance (AI prohibited, see details below) for all assignments in all MSN courses.

• AI platforms and tools are strictly prohibited and must not be used to complete assessments, graded assignments, or clinical documentation unless explicitly permitted by the course director, instructor, or faculty.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in Exams
  • AI use during assessments is prohibited unless a course or assessment explicitly allows it
  • The university treats use of AI in violation of an assessment protocol as cheating, and the PA program separately states that AI tools must not be used to complete assessments unless explicitly permitted by program faculty

"Cheating" is defined as wrongfully giving, taking, or presenting any information or material borrowed from another source (including the Internet) by a student with the intent of aiding themself or another in academic work. This includes, but is not limited to, a test, examination, presentation, experiment, or any written assignment, which is considered in any way in the determination of the final grade. Using AI in violation of a course or assessment’s stated AI protocol is cheating.

• AI platforms and tools are strictly prohibited and must not be used to complete assessments, graded assignments, or clinical documentation unless explicitly permitted by the course director, instructor, or faculty.

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for Study
  • The university does not set one institution-wide rule for AI as general study help, but some programs restrict it heavily
  • Nursing and MSN materials prohibit AI for activities such as brainstorming, organization, note taking, and writing support unless specifically authorized, while the PA program says students may use AI to enhance learning and research but it must not replace critical thinking, independent learning, or evidence-based medical resources

You may not use AI tools to assist with: brainstorming, organization, research, writing, editing, note taking, polishing, etc.

You may use your word processor’s spell-check feature, the thesaurus, the dictionary, a citation management system (may not include AI tools or links to AI tools), our library’s research databases, and appointments in the Buc Hub with writing tutors for assistance with your writing processes.

This establishes guidelines for the ethical, responsible, and effective use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the CSU PA program and ensures that PA students responsibly utilize AI to enhance learning, research, and clinical training while upholding academic integrity, professionalism, and patient-centered care. AI should never replace medical literature or evidence-based medical resources and is not considered a substitute for critical thinking or independent learning.

Use caution and avoid overreliance on AI, which can be inaccurate or biased. Verify, cite, and consistently use your knowledge base and clinical reasoning skills.

U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
Editing-Level Use AllowedDisclosure Required
  • There is no university-wide research-manuscript policy, but program-level materials address AI use in papers and similar written work
  • The PA program says AI may be used to enhance research, but significant contributions to a student's work must be cited or acknowledged
  • Nursing and MSN materials prohibit AI for research, writing, and editing by default, but allow it on select assignments only when an instructor explicitly authorizes it and then require citation and verification against professional literature

You may not use AI tools to assist with: brainstorming, organization, research, writing, editing, note taking, polishing, etc.

In select assignments (e.g., research papers, annotated bibliographies, case study drafts, presentation outlines), AI tools may be permitted to support work—only if explicitly authorized by the course instructor. This permission will be stated in the syllabus and on the assignment instructions. If a course instructor allows for the use of AI-generated content in the completion of the assignments (e.g., research papers, presentations, etc.), then that content will need to be cited (and the content verified by the professional literature) as would any other source. Paraphrases and direct quotes from AI-generated content would need to follow APA formatting guidelines.

In select assignments (e.g., research papers, annotated bibliographies, case study drafts, presentation outlines), AI tools may be permitted to support work—only if explicitly authorized by the course instructor. This permission will be stated in the syllabus and/or on the assignment instructions. If a course instructor allows for the use of AI-generated content in the completion of the assignments (e.g., research papers, presentations, etc.), then that content will need to be cited (and the content verified by the professional literature) as would any other source. Paraphrases and direct quotes from AI-generated content would need to follow APA formatting guidelines.

This establishes guidelines for the ethical, responsible, and effective use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the CSU PA program and ensures that PA students responsibly utilize AI to enhance learning, research, and clinical training while upholding academic integrity, professionalism, and patient-centered care.

The use of AI for significant contributions to your work must be cited or acknowledged to avoid plagiarism. The CSU PA program uses the AMA format for writing and citations.

U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
📋
No policy defined yet
🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • Disclosure and citation are required when AI use is allowed or materially contributes to work
  • University policy states that using AI without proper citation is plagiarism, and several handbooks provide a required acknowledgment statement or specify citation format
  • The PA program requires citation or acknowledgment for significant AI contributions and uses AMA format; nursing and MSN materials require citation, verification against professional literature, and provide a model disclosure statement

Any use of AI models without proper citation is plagiarism.

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) without giving proper credit is also considered plagiarism, per the Academic Integrity Policy.

If a course instructor allows for the use of AI-generated content in the completion of the assignments (e.g., research papers, presentations, etc.), then that content will need to be cited (and the content verified by the professional literature) as would any other source. Paraphrases and direct quotes from AI-generated content would need to follow APA formatting guidelines.

To indicate the use of a Generative AI resource, a student should include the following statement in their assignments: "The author(s) acknowledge the utilization of [Generative AI Tool Name], a language model developed by [Generative AI Tool Provider], in the preparation of this assignment. The [Generative AI Tool Name] was employed in the following manner(s) within this assignment [e.g., brainstorming, grammatical correction, citation, specific section of the assignment, etc.]."

The use of AI for significant contributions to your work must be cited or acknowledged to avoid plagiarism. The CSU PA program uses the AMA format for writing and citations.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Integrity Process
  • The university enforces AI-related misconduct through its academic integrity process
  • Faculty may submit AI reports and other documentation as evidence, instructors may impose a zero on the assignment or an F in the course, a second offense results in an FD for the course under the university policy, and a third offense results in permanent expulsion; the PA program separately states that undisclosed AI-generated work may lead to expulsion and that a second academic integrity violation results in dismissal from the program

This email should include all supporting evidence, including proof of communication attempts (such as email or Blackboard correspondence with screenshots), the course syllabus, assignment instructions or rubric, AI reports, photos, videos, and any other relevant documentation.

Within the AVF, the instructor will determine the appropriate penalty: either to assign a grade of zero on that assignment in question or a grade of "F" in the course.

If upon receipt of the Academic Violation Form the Registrar determines this is the second offense committed by the student, then a grade of FD (Failure Due to Academic Dishonesty) will be assigned by the Registrar for the course regardless of the penalty specified on the Academic Violation Form.

Upon receipt by the Registrar of a third offense, the Registrar will assign the grade of FD and then notify all parties. After all appeals are exhausted, if the third offense still stands, the student will be immediately and permanently expelled from the University.

• Submitting AI-generated work as original without disclosure is considered plagiarism, which is Academic Dishonesty and a violation of ethical integrity. That will result in academic discipline, including expulsion from the University.

4. A second violation of the Academic Integrity Policy will result in dismissal from the program. There is no appeal process for a second violation of this policy.

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff Guidelines
  • The provided sources therefore only address faculty roles in setting student AI rules and enforcing violations
  • The university requires instructors to define permissible AI use for students in syllabi and assignment instructions, but it does not provide an explicit policy in these sources on faculty or staff using AI for grading, feedback, lesson planning, recommendation letters, or administrative communications

Instructors will include academic dishonesty/integrity standards, including explicit permissible AI use, on their course syllabi and each individual assignment.

In select assignments (e.g., research papers, annotated bibliographies, case study drafts, presentation outlines), AI tools may be permitted to support work—only if explicitly authorized by the course instructor. This permission will be stated in the syllabus and on the assignment instructions.

• AI platforms and tools are strictly prohibited and must not be used to complete assessments, graded assignments, or clinical documentation unless explicitly permitted by the course director, instructor, or faculty.

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools Listed
  • The provided sources do not set a university-wide approved-platform or data-classification policy for AI
  • Program-level materials do identify some disallowed tools in nursing courses, including generative AI software, named editing and translation tools, and embedded AI assistance in word-processing platforms

The use of any generative AI software (such as ChatGPT), editing software (such as Grammarly), and translation software (such as DeepL Translate) is prohibited. Further, embedded AI assistance (such as Gemini in Google Docs or Co-Pilot and the “Editing” feature in Microsoft Word) is not allowed for use in nursing courses.

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • The sources do not describe a university-wide AI strategy, committee, or governance framework
  • The PA program does state that its own AI policy is intended to evolve as technology changes, and it frames the policy around ethical, responsible, and effective use

This establishes guidelines for the ethical, responsible, and effective use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools within the CSU PA program and ensures that PA students responsibly utilize AI to enhance learning, research, and clinical training while upholding academic integrity, professionalism, and patient-centered care.

This policy is anticipated to grow and change with advances in technology.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Charleston Southern University's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai