Teaching & Learning
Research
Academic Integrity
Institutional & Administrative
- Faculty and staff are provided with an AI-related teaching resource, but the university does not state a governing policy for how instructors or staff may use AI in grading, feedback, lesson planning, letters, or administrative work in the provided sources
* Artificial Intelligence Teaching Guide†teachingcommons.stanford.edu
- AI tools require IT approval before purchase
- The provided sources do not identify approved AI platforms by name beyond listing AI tools as subject to IT approval
- The university also requires technology review for security considerations, limits access to proprietary information to authorized job duties, requires reporting unauthorized disclosure, and allows monitoring and auditing of university systems
You must submit a helpdesk ticket to obtain quotes for the purchase of any technology requiring pre-approval.
* AI tools (such as Asana, Grammarly, ChatGPT, and others)
* Security: How does it keep personal data safe?
Users may access, use, or share ECSU proprietary information only to the extent it is authorized and necessary to fulfill assigned ECSU job duties.
Users have a responsibility to promptly report the theft, loss, or unauthorized disclosure of ECSU proprietary information.
For security and network maintenance/operation purposes, authorized individuals within ECSU may monitor ECSU equipment, systems, and network traffic at any time, in accordance with ECSU policies and procedures.
ECSU reserves the right to audit networks and systems on a periodic basis to ensure compliance with this policy and, in instances of misuse, take appropriate disciplinary measures, including legal action.
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About Elizabeth City State University's AI Policies
Elizabeth City State University has defined AI policies in 2 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 17%.
No explicit disclosure requirement is currently defined in the available policy sources.
No explicit detection or enforcement process is currently defined in the available policy sources.
AI tools require IT approval before purchase. The university also requires technology review for security considerations, limits access to proprietary information to authorized job duties, requires reporting unauthorized disclosure, and allows monitoring and auditing of university systems. The provided sources do not identify approved AI platforms by name beyond listing AI tools as subject to IT approval.