Georgia Gwinnett College AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
83%10 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Georgia Gwinnett College has defined AI policies across 10 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI Prohibited
  • The university does not state a single AI rule specifically for coursework and assignments in the public sources provided
  • Its student conduct policy says students may not represent someone else’s work as their own and that collaboration on out-of-class assignments is cheating if the professor prohibits it

B. Cheating: This act of dishonesty includes but is not limited to giving information to or taking information from other students during examinations. Cheating is also committed when students copy from unauthorized sources and/or represent some other person’s work as their own. Collaboration on out-of-class assignments or examinations is considered to be cheating if prohibited by the professor.

C. Plagiarism: This category includes copying material from unpublished or published sources, including electronic resources, and submitting that material as the student’s own work. Students are responsible for identifying the proper source and for giving credit to that source anytime that they present ideas which are not their own.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in ExamsIntegrity Code Applies
  • The university does not provide an AI-specific exam rule in the public sources provided
  • The student conduct policy prohibits use or possession of unauthorized materials or resources during an examination, quiz, or other academic activity without the faculty member’s express permission

D. Unauthorized use or possession of materials or resources: Students must not use or possess unauthorized materials or resources in an academic activity. This act includes but is not limited to use/possession of a cheat sheet when not authorized to do so or use/possession of any other resources or materials during an examination, quiz, or other academic activity without the express permission of the faculty member, whether access to such resources or materials is through a cell phone, other electronic device, or any other means.

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for StudyVerification Advised
  • GGC provides AI tools and learning resources that can support study, learning, and skill development
  • The public materials encourage users to verify AI output, review it for bias, and disclose AI use for relevant activities, but they do not define a specific student policy for personal study assistance

The artificial intelligence collection on LinkedIn Learning has videos that offer a basic overview on artificial intelligence and includes topics on generative AI, general AI definitions and terms, ethical considerations and prompt engineering.

DO disclose the use and scope of AI tools for relevant activities. | DON’T assume that public data is free of copyright restrictions.

DO verify the accuracy and validity of AI generated content with reliable sources. | DON’T use AI tools that are on the prohibited software and services list.

DO review AI generated content for bias and edit, as necessary.

Panorama provides instructors with recommendations, examples and training for improving the accessibility of content such as Word documents, PowerPoint presentations and PDF files. For both instructors and students, Panorama offers alternate ways/formats to consume content. Panorama automatically generates these alternative formats for many MyCourses’ course files and makes them available for download.

U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
Data Policy Defined
  • It also instructs users not to enter sensitive, protected, regulated, or confidential data into AI tools
  • The university publicly identifies approved AI and Microsoft tools that can create content, analyze data, and summarize information, but it does not set a research-specific policy for AI data analysis in the provided public sources

DON’T enter any sensitive, protected, regulated or confidential data into an AI tool.

Copilot premium gives users full access to Microsoft 365 Copilot, enabling AI-powered assistance across Microsoft applications to help create content, analyze data, summarize meetings and emails, automate routine tasks, and work more efficiently with organizational data.

Analyze data using built-in features, formulas, and functions.

U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Review Board InvolvedEthics Framework Active
  • The public sources provided do not set AI-specific requirements for grant proposals, IRB applications, or ethics declarations
  • The student handbook does state general research integrity expectations and prohibits plagiarism as a research integrity violation

1. Uphold the highest standards of intellectual honesty and integrity in the conduct of teaching, research, service and grants administration.

Members of the USG community engaged in research are expected to do so in accordance with institutional, governmental and professional standards while upholding the highest standards of integrity, intellectual honesty and scholarship. Unacceptable violations of research integrity include, but are not limited to: (a) plagiarism

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • GGC instructs users to disclose the use and scope of AI tools for relevant activities
  • The student handbook also requires students to identify and give credit to sources whenever they present ideas that are not their own, but the public sources do not provide an AI-specific citation format

DO disclose the use and scope of AI tools for relevant activities. | DON’T assume that public data is free of copyright restrictions.

Students are responsible for identifying the proper source and for giving credit to that source anytime that they present ideas which are not their own.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedPenalties Defined
  • GGC provides Turnitin Draft Coach as a student feedback tool for text similarity, citation, and grammar, and says it may be used to address unintentional plagiarism
  • For enforcement, alleged academic dishonesty is handled through the Faculty Adjudication Process and/or Formal Resolution, with case-by-case sanctions that can include failure of the course, grade reduction, no credit, or reduction of points

Turnitin Draft Coach provides students with instant feedback on text similarity, citation and grammar as they write. Draft Coach may be used to address unintentional plagiarism.

All violations of the Academic Integrity Policy shall be resolved via the Faculty Adjudication Process and/or the Formal Resolution (Student Integrity Board hearing through the Office of Student Integrity) as outlined below.

The appropriate sanction(s) for a violation of academic dishonesty must be decided on a case-by-case basis as appropriate by academic discipline, teaching method, course level, academic classification, maturity of the student, and degree of misconduct.

The instructor may issue any of the sanctions listed below separately or in combination:

1. Failure of the course

2. Reduction of final course grade

3. No credit (“0” for assignment)

4. Reduction of points earned on the assignment

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff Guidelines
  • GGC also emphasizes that employees should review and edit AI-generated content, verify accuracy, review for bias, and avoid prohibited software and sensitive data
  • Faculty and staff are encouraged to review the AI policy and audience-specific guidance, and the college publicly describes staff use cases for Copilot Chat in instructional and administrative work

Faculty and staff are encouraged to review the policy and visit the AI Resources webpage for the latest guidance, approved tools, and supporting materials.

To support implementation, the committee also prepared audience-specific guidance to help faculty, staff, and students apply the policy in their respective roles.

One Kaufman Librarian uses Copilot Chat to generate content like workshop descriptions, learning outcomes, presentation bullet points, active learning activity ideas, and survey questions. The librarian also uses Copilot Chat as an instructional tool, teaching users how to work with generative AI models effectively.

An IT staff member uses Copilot Chat to search files by topic/keyword and summarize conversations to determine their next course of action. They also use it through its integration with other Microsoft 365 applications . Two examples are using it in Outlook to rewrite emails for clarity and structure and in Excel to create smart formulas and dashboards.

Both the Kaufman Librarian and IT staff member made a point to mention that they always review and edit content generated by Copilot Chat.

DO verify the accuracy and validity of AI generated content with reliable sources.

DO review AI generated content for bias and edit, as necessary.

Faculty and staff, including student assistants, may not use the prohibited software or services on state-owned or issued devices.

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools ListedData Protection ActiveUnapproved AI Blocked
  • GGC states that users must not enter sensitive, protected, regulated, or confidential data into AI tools and must not use AI tools on the prohibited software list
  • The college also maintains an approved AI tools inventory, identifies Copilot Chat as included with GGC accounts and protected by enterprise data security, and prohibits certain software and AI note-taking tools on state-owned or issued devices and in GGC virtual meetings

DON’T enter any sensitive, protected, regulated or confidential data into an AI tool.

DON’T use AI tools that are on the prohibited software and services list.

Explore the approved AI tools available to support your work, learning and creativity at Georgia Gwinnett College such as Copilot Chat.

Copilot Chat is Microsoft’s AI chatbot interface included with all GGC Microsoft accounts.

Microsoft Copilot is protected by enterprise-grade data security features, ensuring that prompts and responses are encrypted, access-controlled and never used to train AI models.

Logging in with your GGC account ensures your Copilot Chats are protected by Microsoft’s enterprise data security, ensuring encrypted, access-controlled use.

Faculty and staff, including student assistants, may not use the prohibited software or services on state-owned or issued devices. If you installed Otter.ai or Read.ai, please disable and remove them. These apps will be blocked, effective Sept. 12, 2025.

The listed software applications may be used on personal devices; however, employees may not access sensitive or protected University System of Georgia or Georgia Gwinnett College (GGC) data on any device with these applications installed.

AI note-taking tools, such as Otter.ai and Read.ai, may not join any GGC virtual meetings in Microsoft Teams, Zoom and other web conferencing platforms.

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body Active
  • The college presents this policy as a framework for responsible and effective AI use and maintains an AI resources site with approved tools, supporting materials, and audience-specific guidance
  • GGC has an Artificial Intelligence Steering Committee and says it has published an Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence for Academic and Administrative Purposes Policy in the Administrative Policy Manual

The Artificial Intelligence Steering Committee announces the publication of the Acceptable Use of Artificial Intelligence for Academic and Administrative Purposes Policy in the Administrative Policy Manual.

As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, this policy provides a framework for the responsible and effective use of AI in support of the college's mission.

To support implementation, the committee also prepared audience-specific guidance to help faculty, staff, and students apply the policy in their respective roles.

GGC has developed and adapted several policies regarding AI use for academic and administrative purposes.

Explore the approved AI tools available to support your work, learning and creativity at Georgia Gwinnett College such as Copilot Chat. From productivity boosters to teaching aids, these resources are designed to help you work smarter, communicate more effectively, while staying aligned with our values of access, innovation and responsible technology use.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Georgia Gwinnett College's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai