Golden Gate University has defined AI policies across 9 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, AI governance strategy.
GGU’s Academic Integrity Policy is being modified to prohibit students from using generative AI to produce a work product unless it is specifically allowed by the instructor.
The Academic Integrity Policy is clear that unauthorized use of these tools is forbidden. That means that, if in your class you’d like to allow students to use paraphrasing and summarizing tools, it’s your prerogative to authorize students to use it. If you choose to go this route, be sure you are communicating clearly and explicitly the authorized parameters of AI use in your class.
Furthermore, GGU’s academic policies acknowledge the role of AI in enhancing student learning. While AI can be a valuable tool, the university emphasizes that it should not replace critical thinking, and each instructor has the discretion to determine its appropriate use in their courses.
not defined
Students
ChatGPT is a legitimate tool that students can use to aid in their studies. Some ways students might use it to
enhance their coursework is to:
• generate study questions
• create practice quizzes
• summarize complex topics
• check facts and equations
• proofread writing
• develop creative ideas for tackling an assignment
Faculty should emphasize that ChatGPT is a tool used to enhance students’ education, not replace it.
Furthermore, GGU’s academic policies acknowledge the role of AI in enhancing student learning. While AI can be a valuable tool, the university emphasizes that it should not replace critical thinking, and each instructor has the discretion to determine its appropriate use in their courses.
If you’re teaching a class
that’s specifically addressing either AI use or cutting-edge business practices, the answer may be
yes. If your class is teaching students the fundamentals of a skill like coding or essay writing, it
may not be.
GGU’s Academic Integrity Policy is being modified to prohibit students from using generative AI to produce a work product unless it is specifically allowed by the instructor.
The Task Force articulates the University’s mission regarding the role of AI in innovating pedagogical approaches and leading and coordinating AI academic initiatives to support faculty teaching, applied research, and student learning.
The program also features a dedicated module on Responsible AI, providing participants with a comprehensive understanding of AI ethics, strategies to mitigate model drift, bias, and hallucinations, and essential insights into navigating regulatory compliance mandates.
If you choose to go this route, be sure you are communicating clearly and explicitly the authorized parameters of AI use in your class.
The Academic Integrity Policy is clear that unauthorized use of these tools is forbidden.
When you suspect a student has violated the Academic Integrity Policy through the unauthorized
use of generative AI technology, be sure to cross-check your results. Most AI detectors
have some rate of error.
Using multiple detectors—including Turnitin (which
shows AI results in the feedback studio only, not in the main list of submitted assignments),
CopyLeaks, Crossplag, Writer.com, OpenAI’s GPT2, and many more—helps to close that error
gap.
When you write to students, remember that many of them don’t understand what is and is not
AI. They may have been using paraphrasing tools and not realized it was AI, for instance. The
goal of the Academic Integrity process isn’t to catch as many people as possible, but to ensure that
our students know what they’re doing, and that they’re doing it responsibly.
If you have any questions about academic integrity or how to proceed with an individual case, please be
in contact with your program director or department chair, or email academicintegrity@ggu.edu.
If you are concerned that a student is using an AI content generator, use a tool called GPT Zero to copy/paste
the student’s work into a textbox, and GPT Zero will report how much of it was written by AI.
Faculty can use ChatGPT to design learner-centered experiences for their classroom. Course objectives can be
optimized by inputting them into ChatGPT using a certain format to ensure that learning objectives are
specific, action oriented, and measurable.
ChatGPT can be integrated into classroom activities. Instructors can ask students to use the chatbot to
generate an essay and have students revise or critique the response; or, generate a first draft of an essay and
have students revise the draft, putting a focus on the writing process. For those teaching math courses,
ChatGPT can be used to generate practice problems and ChatGPT can provide step-by-step explanations on
how to solve those problems.
Ultimately, it’s part of the role of faculty to foster the skills students need to become lifelong learners. Faculty
can design assessments that support students’ critical thinking and analytical skills, which are not easily
replicated by AI.
While AI can be a valuable tool, the university emphasizes that it should not replace critical thinking, and each instructor has the discretion to determine its appropriate use in their courses.
GGU has launched a university-wide task force to develop a strategic plan in harnessing AI across all university activities and programs.
The Task Force articulates the University’s mission regarding the role of AI in innovating pedagogical approaches and leading and coordinating AI academic initiatives to support faculty teaching, applied research, and student learning.
In addition, the Task Force will promote and foster collaborations with the community that advances experiential learning opportunities for students. Non-academic objectives are to increase the visibility of AI initiatives on campus and in the community, and to partner with various enterprises to establish academic-business partnerships.
Golden Gate University’s comprehensive approach to AI integration reflects its commitment to preparing students for the evolving demands of the workforce. By embedding AI across its curriculum, transforming traditional assessment models, and contributing to the broader discourse on AI, GGU is not only preparing students for the challenges of tomorrow but is also leading the way in shaping the future of education.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Golden Gate University has defined AI policies in 9 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 75%.
Golden Gate University does not define a university-wide disclosure or citation requirement for AI use in submitted work in the provided sources. The materials require instructors who authorize AI to communicate the permitted parameters clearly, but they do not state a student disclosure or attribution format.
Golden Gate University states that unauthorized AI use is treated through the academic integrity process. The university advises instructors to cross-check suspected AI misuse because detectors have error rates, recommends using multiple detectors, and notes that students may not understand that some tools are AI. It also directs faculty to academic integrity leadership for help with individual cases.
No explicit data protection or approved AI platform policy is currently defined in the available policy sources.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai