Golden Gate University AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
75%9 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Golden Gate University has defined AI policies across 9 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI ProhibitedViolations Enforced
  • Golden Gate University states that student use of generative AI for graded work is prohibited unless the instructor specifically authorizes it
  • The university also indicates that instructors may set class-specific parameters for allowed AI use, so the rule operates through instructor discretion within the academic integrity framework

GGU’s Academic Integrity Policy is being modified to prohibit students from using generative AI to produce a work product unless it is specifically allowed by the instructor.

The Academic Integrity Policy is clear that unauthorized use of these tools is forbidden. That means that, if in your class you’d like to allow students to use paraphrasing and summarizing tools, it’s your prerogative to authorize students to use it. If you choose to go this route, be sure you are communicating clearly and explicitly the authorized parameters of AI use in your class.

Furthermore, GGU’s academic policies acknowledge the role of AI in enhancing student learning. While AI can be a valuable tool, the university emphasizes that it should not replace critical thinking, and each instructor has the discretion to determine its appropriate use in their courses.

U2Examinations & Assessments
Instructor Discretion
  • The sources discuss assessment design and instructor discretion generally, but do not set a specific exam-use policy
  • Golden Gate University does not define a university-wide rule specifically addressing AI use during exams, quizzes, or formal assessments

not defined

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for Study
  • The university also says AI should enhance education rather than replace student learning or critical thinking
  • Golden Gate University states that ChatGPT is a legitimate study aid for students and gives examples of permitted support uses such as study questions, practice quizzes, summarizing topics, checking facts and equations, proofreading, and brainstorming assignment ideas

Students

ChatGPT is a legitimate tool that students can use to aid in their studies. Some ways students might use it to

enhance their coursework is to:

• generate study questions

• create practice quizzes

• summarize complex topics

• check facts and equations

• proofread writing

• develop creative ideas for tackling an assignment

Faculty should emphasize that ChatGPT is a tool used to enhance students’ education, not replace it.

Furthermore, GGU’s academic policies acknowledge the role of AI in enhancing student learning. While AI can be a valuable tool, the university emphasizes that it should not replace critical thinking, and each instructor has the discretion to determine its appropriate use in their courses.

U4Code Generation & Programming
Instructor Discretion
  • Golden Gate University does not define a specific university-wide policy for AI code generation on programming assignments
  • The sources mention coding as a skill area where instructors may or may not choose to teach AI use, but they do not establish a separate coding rule beyond general instructor discretion and unauthorized-use restrictions

If you’re teaching a class

that’s specifically addressing either AI use or cutting-edge business practices, the answer may be

yes. If your class is teaching students the fundamentals of a skill like coding or essay writing, it

may not be.

GGU’s Academic Integrity Policy is being modified to prohibit students from using generative AI to produce a work product unless it is specifically allowed by the instructor.

🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Review Board InvolvedEthics Framework Active
  • No explicit research-ethics compliance rule for AI is stated in the supplied materials
  • Golden Gate University references support for applied research and includes responsible AI topics in an academic program, but the provided sources do not define a policy for AI use in grant proposals, IRB materials, ethics declarations, or research-integrity submissions

The Task Force articulates the University’s mission regarding the role of AI in innovating pedagogical approaches and leading and coordinating AI academic initiatives to support faculty teaching, applied research, and student learning.

The program also features a dedicated module on Responsible AI, providing participants with a comprehensive understanding of AI ethics, strategies to mitigate model drift, bias, and hallucinations, and essential insights into navigating regulatory compliance mandates.

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • Golden Gate University does not define a university-wide disclosure or citation requirement for AI use in submitted work in the provided sources
  • The materials require instructors who authorize AI to communicate the permitted parameters clearly, but they do not state a student disclosure or attribution format

If you choose to go this route, be sure you are communicating clearly and explicitly the authorized parameters of AI use in your class.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Integrity Process
  • It also directs faculty to academic integrity leadership for help with individual cases
  • Golden Gate University states that unauthorized AI use is treated through the academic integrity process
  • The university advises instructors to cross-check suspected AI misuse because detectors have error rates, recommends using multiple detectors, and notes that students may not understand that some tools are AI

The Academic Integrity Policy is clear that unauthorized use of these tools is forbidden.

When you suspect a student has violated the Academic Integrity Policy through the unauthorized

use of generative AI technology, be sure to cross-check your results. Most AI detectors

have some rate of error.

Using multiple detectors—including Turnitin (which

shows AI results in the feedback studio only, not in the main list of submitted assignments),

CopyLeaks, Crossplag, Writer.com, OpenAI’s GPT2, and many more—helps to close that error

gap.

When you write to students, remember that many of them don’t understand what is and is not

AI. They may have been using paraphrasing tools and not realized it was AI, for instance. The

goal of the Academic Integrity process isn’t to catch as many people as possible, but to ensure that

our students know what they’re doing, and that they’re doing it responsibly.

If you have any questions about academic integrity or how to proceed with an individual case, please be

in contact with your program director or department chair, or email academicintegrity@ggu.edu.

If you are concerned that a student is using an AI content generator, use a tool called GPT Zero to copy/paste

the student’s work into a textbox, and GPT Zero will report how much of it was written by AI.

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff Guidelines
  • The sources do not define rules for grading, recommendation letters, or administrative communications, but they do provide explicit instructional-use guidance for faculty
  • Golden Gate University encourages faculty use of ChatGPT for course design, classroom activities, and assessment design, and it states that instructors have discretion to determine appropriate AI use in their courses

Faculty can use ChatGPT to design learner-centered experiences for their classroom. Course objectives can be

optimized by inputting them into ChatGPT using a certain format to ensure that learning objectives are

specific, action oriented, and measurable.

ChatGPT can be integrated into classroom activities. Instructors can ask students to use the chatbot to

generate an essay and have students revise or critique the response; or, generate a first draft of an essay and

have students revise the draft, putting a focus on the writing process. For those teaching math courses,

ChatGPT can be used to generate practice problems and ChatGPT can provide step-by-step explanations on

how to solve those problems.

Ultimately, it’s part of the role of faculty to foster the skills students need to become lifelong learners. Faculty

can design assessments that support students’ critical thinking and analytical skills, which are not easily

replicated by AI.

While AI can be a valuable tool, the university emphasizes that it should not replace critical thinking, and each instructor has the discretion to determine its appropriate use in their courses.

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
📋
No policy defined yet
U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • The university also describes a broad institutional commitment to embedding AI across its curriculum and assessment models
  • Golden Gate University states that it has launched a university-wide AI task force to create a strategic plan for AI across university activities and programs
  • The task force is charged with coordinating AI academic initiatives, supporting faculty teaching, applied research, and student learning, and building community and enterprise partnerships

GGU has launched a university-wide task force to develop a strategic plan in harnessing AI across all university activities and programs.

The Task Force articulates the University’s mission regarding the role of AI in innovating pedagogical approaches and leading and coordinating AI academic initiatives to support faculty teaching, applied research, and student learning.

In addition, the Task Force will promote and foster collaborations with the community that advances experiential learning opportunities for students. Non-academic objectives are to increase the visibility of AI initiatives on campus and in the community, and to partner with various enterprises to establish academic-business partnerships.

Golden Gate University’s comprehensive approach to AI integration reflects its commitment to preparing students for the evolving demands of the workforce. By embedding AI across its curriculum, transforming traditional assessment models, and contributing to the broader discourse on AI, GGU is not only preparing students for the challenges of tomorrow but is also leading the way in shaping the future of education.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Golden Gate University's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai