Harvey Mudd College has defined AI policies across 12 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. AI use in coursework is addressed on a case-by-case basis, with policies set at the instructor level. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.
Students should make sure they understand AI guidelines for their classes and other academic projects (e.g. Clinic, thesis). Students must consult with the instructor and course policies – seeking clarification as needed – before using AI for academic work. The operational guidelines referenced on this site are intended to complement—not replace—the specific instructions and expectations set by individual faculty members.
The Honor Code means closed-book exams in your dorm room. No AI-specific examination rule is stated in the available sources; the Honor Code's general standards include honesty and integrity in both academic and personal matters and compliance with College regulations and policies.
Harvey Mudd College students have access to AI that meets college data protection requirements for AI tools, included in Google Workspace (Gemini and NotebookLM) and Microsoft 365 (Copilot). If a student is using AI for an approved use, they are strongly encouraged to use these tools as opposed to consumer versions (whether free or paid) and especially if they are working with college data.
It allows users to ask questions, generate summaries, create study guides, flash cards, or produce mind maps and narrated slide videos directly from those sources.
Students should make sure they understand AI guidelines for their classes and other academic projects. Students must consult with the instructor and course policies – seeking clarification as needed – before using AI for academic work.
In alignment with the goals and intended outcomes of this thesis course (including independent information sourcing, effective communication, and fundamentally, the production of an original thesis), the use of generative artificial intelligence (i.e. tools like ChatGPT) for producing text in your thesis is not allowed. It will count as an Honor Code Violation.
All the text in your thesis must be solely your work, reflecting your unique perspective, arguments, and insights, which will be developed through your research. Text that is mechanically produced or derived using generative AI does not constitute your original work (academic journals are increasingly forbidding AI-generated text). However, recognizing that AI can have legitimate and powerful applications in other aspects of the research process, your research advisor may permit some specific uses for your particular thesis project. In instances where approval is given, you are required to offer full disclosure about the nature and extent of the AI usage.
However, recognizing that AI can have legitimate and powerful applications in other aspects of the research process, your research advisor may permit some specific uses for your particular thesis project. In instances where approval is given, you are required to offer full disclosure about the nature and extent of the AI usage.
“Only Google Workspace for Education, Microsoft 365 for Education and Workday can be used on P3 and P4 data.”
“Make sure you know whether the AI you’re interested in is on the college approved list or not. If it is not, you cannot use it with P4 and P3 data but you can still use it with P2 data and P1 data.”
not defined
In instances where approval is given, you are required to offer full disclosure about the nature and extent of the AI usage.
“Make sure you know whether the AI you’re interested in is on the college approved list or not.”
In alignment with the goals and intended outcomes of this thesis course (including independent information sourcing, effective communication, and fundamentally, the production of an original thesis), the use of generative artificial intelligence (i.e. tools like ChatGPT) for producing text in your thesis is not allowed. It will count as an Honor Code Violation.
Harvey Mudd College is an inclusive community of faculty, staff and students. Students entering the community are assumed to have an earnest purpose. Diligent pursuit of this purpose is enhanced by standards of conduct agreed upon by the community. These standards are:
1. Thoughtful respect for the rights of others;
2. Honesty and integrity in both academic and personal matters;
3. Responsible behavior both on and off campus;
4. Appropriate use of campus buildings and equipment, and;
5. Compliance with College regulations and policies
As the AI landscape evolves, Harvey Mudd College is implementing a proactive strategy focused on academic impact, faculty/staff professional development, and operational compliance. This site is a resource for this ongoing work.
Faculty and staff may contact CIS to purchase licenses for Google AI Pro for Education or Microsoft 365 Copilot.
College-Supported AI Tools: The college provides AI tools with enhanced data protection through your official college accounts using your HMC credentials. The “basic” versions are included in each suite and we strongly encourage you to use these approved versions, because they provide better protections than the consumer versions.
“P3 and P4 data can only be used in systems that are approved by the college.“
“Only Google Workspace for Education, Microsoft 365 for Education and Workday can be used on P3 and P4 data.”
“Make sure you know whether the AI you’re interested in is on the college approved list or not. If it is not, you cannot use it with P4 and P3 data but you can still use it with P2 data and P1 data.”
The following are our current AI requirements for systems that may be used on P3 and P4 data:
* A formal contract between the software vendor and the college must be signed by an authorized signer and in accordance to HMC’s contract procedures.
* The vendor must not use HMC data to train its AI models.
* The vendor’s employees must not review HMC data.
* HMC must control whether data leaves the college “tenant”.
* The vendor’s service must meet the college’s privacy, security and compliance requirements.
* The vendor must agree to promptly destroy the tenant data at the end of the contract.
As the AI landscape evolves, Harvey Mudd College is implementing a proactive strategy focused on academic impact, faculty/staff professional development, and operational compliance. This site is a resource for this ongoing work.
We recognize that many decisions about AI use are still unfolding. For now, the following will serve as the designated group for operational AI oversight:
Karl Haushalter, Vice President of Academic Affairs and Dean of Faculty
Andrew Dorantes, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Joseph Vaughan, CIO/VP for Computing and Information Services
This group represents faculty, operations, and technology and their roles position them to gather feedback from across the community and ensure alignment with contractual and cybersecurity obligations.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Harvey Mudd College has defined AI policies in 12 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 100%.
When AI use is approved in specific contexts, such as the chemistry thesis, full disclosure of the nature and extent of AI usage is required. The broader AI guidelines direct users to understand which AI tools are approved and to comply with data handling rules, but a formal university-wide AI citation or attribution format is not explicitly defined in the available sources.
The sources do not mention AI detection tools. For enforcement, the chemistry thesis policy states that prohibited AI-generated thesis text will count as an Honor Code violation, and the college Honor Code emphasizes honesty, integrity, and compliance with college policies.
Harvey Mudd directs users to college-supported AI tools with enhanced data protection and strongly encourages use of approved institutional versions rather than consumer versions. Protected data may only be used in approved systems, only certain platforms may be used with P3 and P4 data, and approved vendors must meet contract, privacy, security, and data-handling requirements.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai