Hope College AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
42%5 of 12
Varies by Course
Coursework
AI use in coursework is determined at the instructor level. Each course may have different rules about AI tools.
Not Defined
Disclosure
No specific AI disclosure or attribution requirements have been published.
Not Defined
Detection
No specific AI detection or enforcement tools have been described in university publications.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Hope College has defined AI policies across 5 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. AI use in coursework is addressed on a case-by-case basis, with policies set at the instructor level. There are no specific AI disclosure requirements currently defined. Research-related AI policies address data analysis. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
Instructor Discretion
  • Hope College does not set a single university-wide rule for student use of AI in coursework and assignments in the provided sources
  • Instead, faculty are required to decide how AI may be used in their courses and explain that policy and rationale to students in the syllabus and verbally

AI Course Policy

Beginning May Term 2026, all faculty are required to have given thought to the use of AI in their course and to communicate this and their reasoning to students both verbally and in the syllabus.

This framework uses a simple color-coded system to communicate your AI policies clearly to students.

U2Examinations & Assessments
📋
No policy defined yet
U3Learning & Study Assistance
📋
No policy defined yet
U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
Data Policy Defined
  • Hope College's data-classification rules apply to AI use with research data
  • Protected data may not be used with any AI tool; confidential and internal data may only be used with Google Gemini for Education or Claude by Anthropic when accessed through a Hope College institutional account administered by CIT; public data may be used with any AI tool

Hope College requirements to protect data extend to all areas of artificial intelligence (AI). AI tools that are free and/or are not licensed by Hope College in an enterprise manner have the potential to expose this data to both current and future unintended uses. The contracts and business models for AI tools are complex, requiring consideration and analysis beyond what is necessary for non-AI services. Excluding data from training is not, on its own, sufficient; many other protections must be ensured.

While all aspects of this document apply universally to both AI and non-AI situations, for the purpose of clarity:

* Protected data may not be used with any AI tool.

* Google Gemini for Education and Claude by Anthropic are the only AI tools that may be used with Confidential and Internal data, but only when Gemini for Education or Claude by Anthropic is accessed using a Hope College account enrolled in an institutional team/enterprise plan administered by CIT.

* Public data may be used with any AI tool.

U7Research Ethics & Integrity
📋
No policy defined yet
🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
📋
No policy defined yet
U9Detection & Enforcement
📋
No policy defined yet
🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Faculty Policy Defined
  • Hope College provides a collection of generative AI resources constructed by a digital instruction specialist to help faculty learn about the capabilities of AI in teaching and learning

The digital instruction specialist has constructed this collection of resources related to generative AI in order to help faculty learn about the capabilities of the technology in connection to teaching and learning.

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Data Protection ActiveUnapproved AI Blocked
  • Hope College has explicit AI data-protection rules
  • The guidelines also state that uncontracted or unvetted services, and AI tools not explicitly named in the document, can only be used for public data
  • Protected data is prohibited in any AI tool; confidential and internal data may only be used with Google Gemini for Education or Claude by Anthropic through a Hope College institutional enterprise/team account administered by CIT; public data may be used with any AI tool

Artificial intelligence tools that are not explicitly named in this document | Can only be used for Public

Any location/service that has not been contracted by Hope College and vetted by a qualified Hope College employee to ensure security, privacy and compliance | Can only be used for Public

Hope College requirements to protect data extend to all areas of artificial intelligence (AI). AI tools that are free and/or are not licensed by Hope College in an enterprise manner have the potential to expose this data to both current and future unintended uses. The contracts and business models for AI tools are complex, requiring consideration and analysis beyond what is necessary for non-AI services. Excluding data from training is not, on its own, sufficient; many other protections must be ensured.

While all aspects of this document apply universally to both AI and non-AI situations, for the purpose of clarity:

* Protected data may not be used with any AI tool.

* Google Gemini for Education and Claude by Anthropic are the only AI tools that may be used with Confidential and Internal data, but only when Gemini for Education or Claude by Anthropic is accessed using a Hope College account enrolled in an institutional team/enterprise plan administered by CIT.

* Public data may be used with any AI tool.

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • Hope College has identifiable AI governance activity through approved guidance and task-force-developed resources
  • The sources show Generative AI Policy Guidance approved by AcAB, an Academic AI Taskforce/Task Force that developed an AI Traffic Light Model and compiled a campus resource guide, but they do not provide a broader institutional AI strategy or roadmap in the provided text

Generative AI Policy Guidance (approved by AcAB, fall 2023)

AI Traffic Light Model (developed by the Academic AI Taskforce, Fall 2025)

This framework uses a simple color-coded system to communicate your AI policies clearly to students.

For additional AI resources, including policy examples, please visit the Campus & Consortium Resource Guide (compiled by the Academic AI Task Force in spring 2026) or contact the Center for Teaching and Learning at ctl@hope.edu.

Recently Approved Documents

Generative AI Policy Guidance

September 2023

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Hope College's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai