Indiana University at Kokomo AI Policy

IndianaPrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
100%12 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Indiana University at Kokomo has defined AI policies across 12 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI Prohibited
  • AI use for coursework is not governed by a single blanket permission rule; course-level expectations may prohibit it, allow some uses, or vary by assignment
  • University conduct rules state that using artificial intelligence as unauthorized external assistance on assignments or academic-related activities is prohibited, and Bloomington syllabus guidance provides instructors with multiple policy options

1. Cheating: Cheating is using, providing, or attempting to use or provide unauthorized assistance, materials, information, or study aids in any form. Cheating is prohibited. Cheating includes, but is not limited to:

1. Using or providing unauthorized external assistance or materials on any exam, assignment, or academic-related activities. This prohibition includes the use of tutors, editing services, commercial term-paper providers, books, notes, calculators, online and electronic resources, artificial intelligence, and wireless communication devices, subject to the following:

Option 1: No Generative AI use permitted

Option 2: Some Generative AI use permitted

Using AI (such as ChatGPT) to assist in completing assignments will be allowed in the following ways:

List acceptable uses here. For example, "In Assignment X, we will be using and citing ChatGPT as part of the assignment."

If you use generative AI in a manner that is not authorized above, it will constitute academic misconduct; there will be an academic sanction, and the incident will be reported.

Option 3: Generative AI use varies by assignment

In this class, the expectations for the use/non-use of AI vary depending on the assignment. It is crucial to follow the specific guidelines for each assignment to maintain academic integrity. If you use generative AI in a manner that is not authorized for the assignment, it will constitute academic misconduct; there will be an academic sanction, and the incident will be reported.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in ExamsIntegrity Code Applies
  • Use of AI in exams and formal assessments is prohibited when it is unauthorized
  • The student code expressly includes exams and assessments within the scope of academic misconduct rules, and identifies artificial intelligence as a prohibited form of unauthorized external assistance

Any exams or assessments, including in-class and take-home exams, entrance and qualifying exams, auditions, theses, and dissertations.

1. Cheating: Cheating is using, providing, or attempting to use or provide unauthorized assistance, materials, information, or study aids in any form. Cheating is prohibited. Cheating includes, but is not limited to:

1. Using or providing unauthorized external assistance or materials on any exam, assignment, or academic-related activities. This prohibition includes the use of tutors, editing services, commercial term-paper providers, books, notes, calculators, online and electronic resources, artificial intelligence, and wireless communication devices, subject to the following:

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for Study
  • For graded work, students are told to follow course-specific rules; for personal learning, the university presents AI as a study-support tool
  • Indiana University provides student-facing guidance that encourages using AI to support learning and study, while distinguishing this from using AI to complete assignments in unauthorized ways

"Use of AI (such as ChatGPT) in this class. Using AI (such as ChatGPT) to assist in completing assignments will be allowed in the following ways: [List of acceptable uses, e.g. "In Assignment x, will be using and citing ChatGPT as part of the assignment."]If you use AI in an unauthorized manner, you will be committing plagiarism* and will be subject to penalties in this class and sanctions by Indiana University."

Be very sure that you clearly understand how you can use AI to work on assignments in your courses.

## Working with AI to Learn

Here, we want to talk about how you can actually work with these incredible tools to improve your learning by freeing you up so you can concentrate on where the real value is: What's happening inside your own head and what that means for your growth as an increasingly confident, educated, capable person (as opposed to just working through your educational tasks as quickly as possible).

For every suggestion of how to use AI below, you can get out into the world, meet someone -- an academic coach, a tutor, a professor, a course assistant, another new friend in class -- and learn as we are built to do best -- interactively, in person, with each other.

U4Code Generation & Programming
AI Code Restricted
  • No university-wide policy specifically addresses AI-generated code for student programming assignments
  • The research data guidance separately notes that LLMs can write code in research contexts, subject to IU's data-classification rules
  • AI use in coursework — including code generation — defaults to the same instructor-option framework applicable to all assignments: instructors may prohibit AI entirely, permit specific uses, or vary rules by assignment

Option 1: No Generative AI use permitted

Option 2: Some Generative AI use permitted

Using AI (such as ChatGPT) to assist in completing assignments will be allowed in the following ways:

List acceptable uses here. For example, "In Assignment X, we will be using and citing ChatGPT as part of the assignment."

Option 3: Generative AI use varies by assignment

In this class, the expectations for the use/non-use of AI vary depending on the assignment. It is crucial to follow the specific guidelines for each assignment to maintain academic integrity.

[Research context only] Generative AI tools, including large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or Claude, can help you summarize literature, draft documents, write code, and analyze quantitative or qualitative data.

🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
Writing Policy Defined
  • Indiana University's research data guidance notes that LLMs such as ChatGPT or Claude can be used to summarize literature and draft documents in research contexts, subject to IU data-ownership and data-classification rules
  • No separate university-wide policy specifically governing AI use in manuscript preparation, thesis writing, or journal article authorship is defined in the available sources; researchers are directed to IU's responsible-use guidance and relevant disciplinary or publisher norms

## Responsible Use of LLMs in Research

Generative AI tools, including large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or Claude, can help you summarize literature, draft documents, write code, and analyze quantitative or qualitative data. But when you conduct research at Indiana University, all research data are considered owned by IU — even if you created the dataset yourself — unless an agreement explicitly assigns ownership elsewhere.

U6Research Data & Analysis
AI Analysis Restricted
  • AI may be used for research data analysis, but only within IU's data-classification rules
  • IU says research data are restricted by default; IU-licensed ChatGPT Edu, Gemini, and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat are safe only for Public research data, while Restricted and Critical data must use REALLMS on IU-owned servers

Generative AI tools, including large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT or Claude, can help you summarize literature, draft documents, write code, and analyze quantitative or qualitative data. But when you conduct research at Indiana University, all research data are considered owned by IU — even if you created the dataset yourself — unless an agreement explicitly assigns ownership elsewhere.

These IU-licensed versions are safe for Public research data if you sign in with your IU account. They are not approved for Restricted or Critical research data. Research data is considered Restricted by default. The University-Internal classification is not used for research data.

Use REALLMS. It runs entirely on IU-owned servers and is approved for Restricted and Critical data, including PHI.

Classifying research data can be complicated and context-dependent. The default classification for research data at IU is restricted.

U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Review Board InvolvedEthics Framework Active
  • The research site points users to AI use policies, rules, guidelines, and ethics, and the School of Education has its own AI guidance committee and framework
  • The provided sources contain general research-AI ethics resources and responsible-use guidance, but they do not define a specific university-wide policy for AI use in grant proposals, IRB applications, or ethics declarations

### AI Use Policies, Rules, Guidelines, and Ethics

Acceptable uses of generative AI services at IU - Generative AI has potential applications across a wide range of industries, including art, writing, and software development. However, there are also concerns about the potential misuse of these tools and any data shared with the services.

As AI continues to shape and change education, the IU School of Education has taken a proactive step forward by introducing the IU School of Education Generative AI Framework: A Visionary Framework for Human-Centered Innovation in Teaching, Learning, and Research.

Put together by the IU School of Education AI Guidance Committee, this guide represents an important step in articulating how the School approaches generative AI thoughtfully, ethically, and with a clear focus on human learning and flourishing.

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • Disclosure and attribution requirements are explicitly stated in instructor-facing sample syllabus language rather than a single university-wide student policy
  • The sample language says AI use must be acknowledged and cited, that most uses require disclosure, and that use without disclosure may be treated as plagiarism or cheating

"Include a permission and acknowledgement disclaimer. 'AI generators/programs such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, QuillBot, Spinbot, Dall-E, etc. should not be used for any work for this class without explicit permission of the instructor and appropriate attribution.' -- from IUB College of Arts & Sciences, Office of Undergraduate Academic Affairs

Any use of such tools must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. Use of GAI without acknowledgement will result in a penalty. The disclosure of use of GAI for spelling and grammar checkers is not necessary, but all other uses of GAI require proper acknowledgment and citations.

The use of GAI platforms without disclosure will be considered plagiarism and/or cheating and will be reported to the Dean of Students and handled according to university policies. Sanctions for academic misconduct in this course may include a failing grade on the assignment, a reduction in your final course grade, or a failing grade in the course, among other possibilities. If you have any questions about the acceptable use of GAI tools, please consult with the instructor before submitting your work.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedPenalties DefinedIntegrity Process
  • Undisclosed or unauthorized AI use is enforced as academic misconduct under IU's student code
  • IU's Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning also provides guidance on AI-generated text and academic integrity, though a detailed substantive policy on specific AI detection tools was not defined in the extracted evidence
  • Faculty determine course-level academic sanctions; incidents are centrally recorded; and the Dean of Students may impose additional university-wide sanctions (probation, suspension, or expulsion) based on severity and prior violations

If you use generative AI in a manner that is not authorized above, it will constitute academic misconduct; there will be an academic sanction, and the incident will be reported.

The use of GAI platforms without disclosure will be considered plagiarism and/or cheating and will be reported to the Dean of Students and handled according to university policies. Sanctions for academic misconduct in this course may include a failing grade on the assignment, a reduction in your final course grade, or a failing grade in the course, among other possibilities.

Whether misconduct has occurred in a particular course, and if so, whether a particular academic sanction (failing grade, repeating an assignment, etc.) is an appropriate response to a finding of misconduct in the course, is handled by the faculty member involved and, if a student appeals the faculty member's determinations, by a hearing board within the school in which the misconduct allegedly occurred.

Second, after a final determination within a school that a student has committed academic misconduct, the Dean of Students and/or Designee determines whether an additional, university-wide sanction (disciplinary probation, suspension, or expulsion) is appropriate based on the nature and severity of the misconduct and/or prior violations by the student.

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff GuidelinesRestricted Use
  • IU provides faculty with a dedicated generative AI resource hub
  • IU has made ChatGPT Edu available to faculty and staff and offers generative AI pilots through the Next.IU program
  • Faculty and staff are authorized to use IU-approved generative AI tools but must follow data privacy and tool-approval requirements

As with other non-IU-vetted technologies, instructors should be cautious when using other GenAI tools with students, and students should never be required to use an unapproved tool.

Sharing institutional data, including student writing, with unapproved third-party tools is against university policy, even if anonymized and de-identified.

IU faculty are invited to explore the potential of generative artificial intelligence through Next.IU, a hands-on Generative AI tool pilot.

Several generative AI tools are widely available for faculty, staff, and students. Learn more about these tools, including their core features, data classification approvals, and usage guidelines.

Indiana University recently announced that staff and faculty on all campuses can request institutional access to ChatGPT Edu, a version of the popular AI tool built specifically for higher education.

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools ListedUnapproved AI Blocked
  • Indiana University has an explicit approved-tools and data-classification approach for AI use
  • Several generative AI tools are approved for IU institutional data; Microsoft Copilot with IU credentials has added protections; unapproved third-party tools cannot receive institutional data such as student writing; and research data have stricter rules, with Public-only use for some IU-licensed tools and REALLMS required for Restricted and Critical data

At IU, several generative AI tools have undergone review and are approved for use with IU institutional data. See information outlined previously on this page as well as this more detailed resource about the available GenAI tools at IU.

Data privacy: Microsoft Copilot, when used with you IU credentials, includes data protections not available in public versions. It is the only widely available tool

University. Sharing institutional data, including student writing, with unapproved third-party tools is against university policy, even if anonymized and de-identified.

These IU-licensed versions are safe for Public research data if you sign in with your IU account. They are not approved for Restricted or Critical research data. Research data is considered Restricted by default. The University-Internal classification is not used for research data.

Use REALLMS. It runs entirely on IU-owned servers and is approved for Restricted and Critical data, including PHI.

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • Indiana University has an active and visible institutional AI strategy encompassing broad deployment of approved AI services, responsible-use training, and multi-unit governance activity
  • At the school level, the IU School of Education AI Guidance Committee has produced a Generative AI Framework for Human-Centered Innovation in Teaching, Learning, and Research, illustrating decentralized governance alongside central strategy
  • University-wide initiatives include the rollout of ChatGPT Edu for faculty and staff, a free GenAI 101 foundational course for the IU community, an expanding suite of IU-reviewed AI services managed through UITS, and a research AI hub at research.iu.edu

The deployment of ChatGPT Edu is one of many ways IU is integrating AI across the academic experience.

In August, IU launched a new, free GenAI 101 course that serves as a foundational program introducing the IU community to generative AI concepts, applications and responsible-use practices.

Together, GenAI 101, ChatGPT Edu and IU's expanding suite of AI services ensure that faculty, staff and students are not only equipped with powerful AI tools but also prepared to use them effectively and ethically.

As AI continues to shape and change education, the IU School of Education has taken a proactive step forward by introducing the IU School of Education Generative AI Framework: A Visionary Framework for Human-Centered Innovation in Teaching, Learning, and Research.

Put together by the IU School of Education AI Guidance Committee, this guide represents an important step in articulating how the School approaches generative AI thoughtfully, ethically, and with a clear focus on human learning and flourishing.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Indiana University at Kokomo's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai