Johnson & Wales University AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
92%11 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Johnson & Wales University has defined AI policies across 11 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI ProhibitedAttribution Required
  • Instructor directions can further restrict resources on particular assignments
  • Use of generative AI for graded coursework is prohibited unless the course instructor gives explicit permission
  • The university treats using AI to produce part or all of an assignment, or even to create an outline, as plagiarism or unauthorized collaboration when permission has not been granted

Using another student’s work and submitting portions or the entire assignment with your name.

2. Using GAI tools to produce part or all of an assignment unless given the explicit (oral or written) permission of the course instructor.

3. Reusing your own work from a previous assignment or publication without acknowledging the earlier use and obtaining permission for the reuse from the instructor to whom the reused work is submitted.

4. Failing to include citations, quotations, or works cited pages when using outside sources, including but not limited to GAI tools.

4. Using GAI tools in the completion of any course assignments, labs, or exams without explicit permission by the course instructor.

4. Using GAI tools to create an outline for an assignment, without the explicit permission of the course instructor.

d) Complying with instructor directives. Notably, individual instructors may explicitly limit use of otherwise permitted resources or prohibit otherwise permissible conduct. For example, an instructor may decide that no use of outside resources are permitted in a particular assignment. In that case, a student may not properly use outside resources even if they are properly sourced and cited.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in Exams
  • The policy classifies AI as an unauthorized study aid when used during an exam without permission
  • Use of generative AI during exams or other assessed work is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly allows it

1. Using unauthorized information, materials, or study aids, such as a phone, cheat sheet, or generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools, during an exam or for an assignment without explicit permission by the course instructor.

4. Using GAI tools in the completion of any course assignments, labs, or exams without explicit permission by the course instructor.

U3Learning & Study Assistance
📋
No policy defined yet
U4Code Generation & Programming
AI Code RestrictedAttribution Required
  • The policy also separately prohibits sharing code with another student as unauthorized collaboration
  • The university does not set a separate AI coding rule, but it does prohibit AI use on coursework without explicit instructor permission, which applies to programming assignments as graded course work

4. Using GAI tools in the completion of any course assignments, labs, or exams without explicit permission by the course instructor.

2. Sharing your computer code with another student.

🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
Editing-Level Use Allowed
  • JWU's research integrity policy does not mention AI use for drafting or editing research writing
  • It does, however, prohibit plagiarism in research and treats manuscripts, journal articles, theses, online content, and research proposals as part of the research record subject to misconduct review

H. Plagiarism means the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving such person appropriate credit.

J. Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.

K. Research record means the record of data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientific inquiry. Data or results may be in physical or electronic form. Examples of information, items, or material that may be considered part of the research record include, but are not limited to, abstracts, clinical research records, journal articles, lab meeting reports, laboratory notebooks, laboratory records, manuscripts, online content, progress reports, raw data, records of oral presentations, research proposals, study records, and theses.

U6Research Data & Analysis
AI Analysis Restricted
  • JWU does not provide an AI-specific rule for using AI in research data collection or analysis
  • Its research integrity policy does prohibit fabrication and falsification of data or results and defines raw data and related records as part of the research record

C. Fabrication means making up data or results and recording or reporting them.

D. Falsification means manipulating research equipment, materials, or processes or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.

K. Research record means the record of data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientific inquiry. Data or results may be in physical or electronic form. Examples of information, items, or material that may be considered part of the research record include, but are not limited to, abstracts, clinical research records, journal articles, lab meeting reports, laboratory notebooks, laboratory records, manuscripts, online content, progress reports, raw data, records of oral presentations, research proposals, study records, and theses.

1. JWU requires all JWU Researchers to adhere to high standards for honesty and integrity in the conduct of scholarly endeavors. Accordingly, JWU strictly prohibits research misconduct by JWU Researchers.

U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Review Board InvolvedEthics Framework Active
  • JWU does not state an AI-specific rule for grant proposals, IRB applications, or ethics filings
  • Its research integrity policy broadly prohibits fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in proposing, performing, reviewing, or reporting research, and includes research proposals within the research record

J. Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.

K. Research record means the record of data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientific inquiry. Data or results may be in physical or electronic form. Examples of information, items, or material that may be considered part of the research record include, but are not limited to, abstracts, clinical research records, journal articles, lab meeting reports, laboratory notebooks, laboratory records, manuscripts, online content, progress reports, raw data, records of oral presentations, research proposals, study records, and theses.

b) Description and documentation of any grant support, including, for example, any grant numbers, grant applications, contracts, and publications listing grant support.

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Citation Required
  • When AI tools are used as outside sources, students must provide appropriate attribution and may need instructor permission depending on the assignment
  • The policy specifically requires citations, quotations, or works cited pages for outside sources, including GAI tools, and tells students to seek clarification if they do not know how to credit sources properly

Plagiarism (including derivations thereof, such as plagiarizing) means using another’s words or ideas and presenting or attempting to present them as your own (i.e., without appropriate attribution or citation).

4. Failing to include citations, quotations, or works cited pages when using outside sources, including but not limited to GAI tools.

b) Obtaining clarification if they do not understand whether certain conduct covered by this Policy is permitted or if they do not understand how to properly credit sources.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedPenalties DefinedIntegrity Process
  • JWU states that student assignments may be submitted to plagiarism detection software such as Turnitin for textual similarity review and plagiarism detection
  • Suspected academic integrity violations must be referred by faculty or staff to Community Standards and Conduct, and sanctions can include failing or reduced grades, required educational measures, suspension, dismissal, or degree rescission

c) Agreeing that by taking courses at JWU, their assignments may be subject to submission to plagiarism detection software (e.g., Turnitin.com) for textual similarity review and/or for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted assignments will be included as source documents in the plagiarism detection database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism or misuse of such assignments. Use of any plagiarism detection software service is subject to the usage policy posted on the software website.

Students agree that by taking courses at JWU, required assignments may be subject to submission to Turnitin for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on Turnitin.com .

2. A faculty or staff member who suspects a violation of Academic Integrity must refer the matter to Community Standards and Conduct through the online Academic Integrity Referral Form (“Form”).

3. When completing the Form, the faculty or staff member should determine a grade sanction, including a failing or reduced grade for the assignment or exam at issue or the course as a whole, redoing the assignment or exam for full or partial credit, a lower final grade, or no grade sanction (“Grade Sanction”).

The faculty or staff member may also recommend, and/or Community Standards and Conduct may decide to impose additional measures beyond the Grade Sanction, which may include, without limitation, imposing academic conduct warnings or conduct probations; requiring completion of the JWU Academic Integrity online module, reflection assignments, student success meetings, and writing appointments; suspending or dismissing the student from the university; or rescinding the student’s degree, (collectively, “Additional Sanctions”).

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff Guidelines
  • The cited materials do not set rules for faculty or staff using AI for grading, feedback, lesson planning, recommendation letters, or administrative writing
  • The academic integrity policy only states that faculty have primary responsibility for maintaining academic integrity and that faculty or staff must report suspected violations

1. Faculty have the primary responsibility of maintaining a culture of Academic Integrity, but all members of the JWU community also share responsibility in maintaining a culture of Academic Integrity.

2. A faculty or staff member who suspects a violation of Academic Integrity must refer the matter to Community Standards and Conduct through the online Academic Integrity Referral Form (“Form”).

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools Listed
  • JWU does not provide a general approved-platform or data-classification policy for AI use in the cited materials
  • The only AI-specific institutional statement says the university uses an AI-powered website search feature, that summaries are based on information published on jwu.edu, and that users should review source pages because AI-generated summaries may be incomplete and inaccurate

Johnson & Wales University uses an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered search feature (SearchStax) to enhance website search results. When a user submits a question through the website search function, the system may generate a brief summary based on information published on jwu.edu. The summary is displayed alongside traditional search results and includes links to the source pages used to generate the response. Users are encouraged to review the source pages for complete information.

AI-generated summaries may be incomplete and inaccurate.

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • The cited sources do not present an overarching university AI strategy, governance committee, roadmap, or institution-wide AI principles
  • The only AI-specific governance-related text is the website search disclaimer describing JWU's AI-powered search summaries and warning users to verify source pages

Johnson & Wales University uses an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered search feature (SearchStax) to enhance website search results. When a user submits a question through the website search function, the system may generate a brief summary based on information published on jwu.edu. The summary is displayed alongside traditional search results and includes links to the source pages used to generate the response. Users are encouraged to review the source pages for complete information.

AI-generated summaries may be incomplete and inaccurate.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Johnson & Wales University's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai