Teaching & Learning
- The university treats unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework as academic misconduct when a student submits AI-generated material as their own or uses unauthorized assistance
- The policy is university-wide at the academic integrity level and does not provide a blanket permission rule; faculty may also set assignment-specific limits through course requirements
Examples of plagiarism include, but are not limited to:
1. The use, by paraphrase or direct quotation, of the published or unpublished work of another person without full and clear acknowledgment.
2. The unacknowledged use of materials prepared by another person or agency engaged in the selling of term papers or other academic materials.
3. The use of an agency engaged in the selling of computer programs or other academic materials.
4. The use of artificial intelligence (e.g., Chat GPT) to generate all or part of an assignment unless explicitly stated otherwise by the instructor.
5. The use of any electronic, digital, or other mechanical aids in completing assignments, quizzes, examinations, tests, or any other assignment to be used for grades in the course and that has not been expressly authorized by the instructor.
The Student Conduct and Academic Integrity office helps to maintain an environment where students can fulfill their educational goals by enforcing the Student Code of Conduct and Academic Integrity policies.
As with many instructional resources, faculty should review the product of AI generators before publication or sharing with students. Guidance on acceptable student use of AI tools should be addressed clearly in the syllabus and class discussions, and should be considered in tandem with Louisiana Tech academic integrity policies.
- This is framed as an academic integrity rule rather than a separate AI exam policy
- Use of AI or other electronic aids during exams or other graded assessments is prohibited unless the instructor expressly authorizes it
The use of any electronic, digital, or other mechanical aids in completing assignments, quizzes, examinations, tests, or any other assignment to be used for grades in the course and that has not been expressly authorized by the instructor.
During an examination, test, quiz, or laboratory practical, a student may not receive outside assistance or consulting, use unauthorized notes, study aids, or equipment, engage in unauthorized collaboration with another person, or make use of any book, article, audio or visual material, audiovisual aid, or electronic, digital, or other mechanical device or aid when such activity or device has not been expressly authorized by the instructor.
- The university provides guidance for faculty on AI as a teaching resource and indicates that acceptable student use of AI tools should be defined in the syllabus and class discussions
- There is no uniform university-wide rule specifically authorizing or prohibiting AI for personal studying or tutoring; expectations are left to instructor guidance alongside academic integrity rules
As with many instructional resources, faculty should review the product of AI generators before publication or sharing with students. Guidance on acceptable student use of AI tools should be addressed clearly in the syllabus and class discussions, and should be considered in tandem with Louisiana Tech academic integrity policies.
Louisiana Tech University supports the use of AI tools to streamline routine communications when appropriate, but all content should still reflect university brand standards, uphold confidentiality, and include human oversight.
Research
Academic Integrity
- It also directs faculty to communicate acceptable AI use clearly in syllabi and class discussions, which may create course-level disclosure expectations
- The university does not provide a general AI citation format in the verified sources, but it requires students not to present AI-generated work as their own when instructor permission has not been given
The use of artificial intelligence (e.g., Chat GPT) to generate all or part of an assignment unless explicitly stated otherwise by the instructor.
Guidance on acceptable student use of AI tools should be addressed clearly in the syllabus and class discussions, and should be considered in tandem with Louisiana Tech academic integrity policies.
- Penalties for violations can include grade consequences, probation, suspension, expulsion, revocation of a degree, and transcript notation
- The university enforces AI-related academic misconduct through its academic integrity process, but the verified sources do not define a policy on AI-detection software
The Student Conduct and Academic Integrity office helps to maintain an environment where students can fulfill their educational goals by enforcing the Student Code of Conduct and Academic Integrity policies.
A student found responsible for an academic integrity violation shall be considered for one or more of the following sanctions:
1. Admonition and Warning
2. Grade adjustment on the examination, written assignment, or other academic work in question
3. Additional academic work to provide evidence of the student’s academic performance and/or to assure that the student knows and comprehends the course content
4. Failing grade in the course
5. Suspension of Scholarship(s)
6. Academic Integrity Probation
7. Suspension from the University
8. Expulsion from the University
9. Revocation of degree
10. Transcript notation
Institutional & Administrative
- Faculty are specifically advised to review AI-generated instructional content before sharing it with students and to set course-level rules on student AI use
- Faculty and staff may use AI tools to streamline routine communications, but outputs must receive human review, follow brand standards, and protect confidentiality
Louisiana Tech University supports the use of AI tools to streamline routine communications when appropriate, but all content should still reflect university brand standards, uphold confidentiality, and include human oversight.
AI should be used to enhance—not replace—the voice and judgment of university communicators.
As with many instructional resources, faculty should review the product of AI generators before publication or sharing with students. Guidance on acceptable student use of AI tools should be addressed clearly in the syllabus and class discussions, and should be considered in tandem with Louisiana Tech academic integrity policies.
- It also states that university-branded content and marks may only be used in AI systems when licensing and legal requirements are satisfied, with institutional approval where needed
- The university requires protection of confidential, private, proprietary, and regulated information when using AI, and it forbids entering such material into public or unapproved platforms without authorization
Do not enter confidential, private, proprietary, or regulated university information into public or unapproved AI platforms.
This includes, but is not limited to:
• Student records protected by FERPA
• Employee or HR data
• Non-public financial or legal information
• Research data subject to confidentiality or grant restrictions
• Any content covered by NDA, contract, or policy restrictions
Do not upload or generate university trademarks, logos, or brand assets in any AI system unless the platform is approved and compliant with licensing, privacy, and legal standards.
The use of Louisiana Tech’s name, logos, trademarks, and other brand identifiers in generative AI tools or outputs must comply with all applicable licensing agreements, intellectual property standards, and institutional review requirements.
- No university-wide AI committee, strategic roadmap, or comprehensive governance framework is explicitly defined in the provided materials
- The verified sources provide limited institution-level AI governance, but they do articulate guiding principles for official communications: AI is supported for appropriate routine use, must not replace human judgment, and must comply with brand, privacy, legal, and accessibility standards
Louisiana Tech University supports the use of AI tools to streamline routine communications when appropriate, but all content should still reflect university brand standards, uphold confidentiality, and include human oversight.
AI should be used to enhance—not replace—the voice and judgment of university communicators.
All AI-assisted content is still subject to existing university policies related to:
• Brand and editorial standards
• Data privacy and confidentiality
• Accessibility
• Legal and licensing review
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About Louisiana Tech University's AI Policies
Louisiana Tech University has defined AI policies in 8 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 67%.
The university does not provide a general AI citation format in the verified sources, but it requires students not to present AI-generated work as their own when instructor permission has not been given. It also directs faculty to communicate acceptable AI use clearly in syllabi and class discussions, which may create course-level disclosure expectations.
The university enforces AI-related academic misconduct through its academic integrity process, but the verified sources do not define a policy on AI-detection software. Penalties for violations can include grade consequences, probation, suspension, expulsion, revocation of a degree, and transcript notation.
The university requires protection of confidential, private, proprietary, and regulated information when using AI, and it forbids entering such material into public or unapproved platforms without authorization. It also states that university-branded content and marks may only be used in AI systems when licensing and legal requirements are satisfied, with institutional approval where needed.