Philander Smith College has defined AI policies across 5 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics.
Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise. [...] This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI). Faculty, at their discretion, may impose sanctions upon the student that range from a reduction in grade on the assignment to an F in the course.
Cheating: intentionally using or attempting to use unauthorized materials, information, notes, study aids, or other devices or materials in any academic exercise. [...] Faculty, at their discretion, may impose sanctions upon the student that range from a reduction in grade on the assignment to an F in the course.
Fabrication: intentional and unauthorized falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic exercise. Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise. [...] This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI).
Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise. [...] This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI). A student found guilty of plagiarism may be subject to disciplinary action which can include probation, suspension, or dismissal.
Academic dishonesty/misconduct is the actual or attempted deception and/or unauthorized use or furnishing of information and/or materials in any academic exercise. Academic dishonesty also includes knowingly assisting others in such acts. Examples of academic dishonesty include but are not limited to the following:
1. Cheating: intentionally using or attempting to use unauthorized materials, information, notes, study aids, or other devices or materials in any academic exercise.
2. Fabrication: intentional and unauthorized falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic exercise.
3. Facilitating academic dishonesty: intentionally or knowingly helping or attempting to help another to commit an act of academic dishonesty.
4. Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one’s own in any academic exercise.
Faculty, at their discretion, may impose sanctions upon the student that range from a reduction in grade on the assignment to an F in the course.
Plagiarism is the act of taking ideas, writings, etc., from another and passing them off as one’s own. This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI).
A student found guilty of plagiarism may be subject to disciplinary action which can include probation, suspension, or dismissal.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Philander Smith College has defined AI policies in 5 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 42%.
Philander Smith College does not have a formal AI disclosure or attribution policy, but its plagiarism definition prohibits submitting AI-generated work as one's own. Unattributed submission of AI-generated work is treated as plagiarism and is subject to disciplinary action.
The provided sources do not state an AI-specific detection policy, but they do define general academic dishonesty rules and sanctions that would govern misconduct cases. Students are prohibited from using unauthorized materials or assistance, and faculty may assign penalties for violations ranging from failure on the work to failure of the course. In the CNA handbook, use of AI-generated work is expressly treated as plagiarism and can lead to disciplinary action, including dismissal from the program.
No explicit data protection or approved AI platform policy is currently defined in the available policy sources.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai