Philander Smith College AI Policy

ArkansasPrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
42%5 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Addressed
Disclosure
The university has addressed AI disclosure in its policies.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Not Defined
Governance
No formal AI governance structure or strategy has been published.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

Philander Smith College has defined AI policies across 5 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI ProhibitedViolations Enforced
  • Students are prohibited from submitting AI-generated content as their own work, and violations may result in assignment- or course-level penalties
  • Philander Smith College does not have a standalone AI-use policy for coursework, but its academic dishonesty framework applicable to academic exercises treats AI-generated work as plagiarism

Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise. [...] This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI). Faculty, at their discretion, may impose sanctions upon the student that range from a reduction in grade on the assignment to an F in the course.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in ExamsIntegrity Code Applies
  • Cheating is explicitly prohibited and subject to faculty-imposed sanctions, including a failing grade on the assignment or in the course
  • Philander Smith College's academic integrity policy prohibits the use of unauthorized materials or assistance in any academic exercise, which encompasses examinations and assessments

Cheating: intentionally using or attempting to use unauthorized materials, information, notes, study aids, or other devices or materials in any academic exercise. [...] Faculty, at their discretion, may impose sanctions upon the student that range from a reduction in grade on the assignment to an F in the course.

U3Learning & Study Assistance
📋
No policy defined yet
U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Ethics Framework Active
  • AI-generated work is explicitly treated as plagiarism, and fabrication of information or citations is prohibited
  • Philander Smith College does not have a standalone AI research ethics policy, but its academic integrity framework prohibits fabrication and plagiarism in academic exercises, which extends to research contexts

Fabrication: intentional and unauthorized falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic exercise. Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise. [...] This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI).

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure Addressed
  • Unattributed submission of AI-generated work is treated as plagiarism and is subject to disciplinary action
  • Philander Smith College does not have a formal AI disclosure or attribution policy, but its plagiarism definition prohibits submitting AI-generated work as one's own

Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one's own in any academic exercise. [...] This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI). A student found guilty of plagiarism may be subject to disciplinary action which can include probation, suspension, or dismissal.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedPenalties Defined
  • In the CNA handbook, use of AI-generated work is expressly treated as plagiarism and can lead to disciplinary action, including dismissal from the program
  • The provided sources do not state an AI-specific detection policy, but they do define general academic dishonesty rules and sanctions that would govern misconduct cases
  • Students are prohibited from using unauthorized materials or assistance, and faculty may assign penalties for violations ranging from failure on the work to failure of the course

Academic dishonesty/misconduct is the actual or attempted deception and/or unauthorized use or furnishing of information and/or materials in any academic exercise. Academic dishonesty also includes knowingly assisting others in such acts. Examples of academic dishonesty include but are not limited to the following:

1. Cheating: intentionally using or attempting to use unauthorized materials, information, notes, study aids, or other devices or materials in any academic exercise.

2. Fabrication: intentional and unauthorized falsification or invention of any information or citation in an academic exercise.

3. Facilitating academic dishonesty: intentionally or knowingly helping or attempting to help another to commit an act of academic dishonesty.

4. Plagiarism: intentionally or knowingly representing the words or ideas of another as one’s own in any academic exercise.

Faculty, at their discretion, may impose sanctions upon the student that range from a reduction in grade on the assignment to an F in the course.

Plagiarism is the act of taking ideas, writings, etc., from another and passing them off as one’s own. This includes any work generated by artificial intelligence (AI).

A student found guilty of plagiarism may be subject to disciplinary action which can include probation, suspension, or dismissal.

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
📋
No policy defined yet
U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
📋
No policy defined yet
U12University AI Governance & Strategy
📋
No policy defined yet

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About Philander Smith College's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai