Teaching & Learning
- The institution also states that using AI-generated content without disclosure and attribution can be treated as academic dishonesty
- Pratt states that use of AI in coursework is governed by instructor discretion and course-specific policies, and students are responsible for knowing those rules before using AI in assignments
The use of AI on course assignments is at the discretion of the faculty member and should be clearly stated in the course syllabus and assignment directions. Students are responsible for understanding the policy in each course and consulting with the faculty member if they are uncertain.
Students are expected to credit all works that are not original with appropriate citations and references. This includes quotations, paraphrases, models, images, and any AI-generated content used in their submissions.
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to generate content without proper attribution, permission, or verification is considered a violation of academic integrity standards. This includes but is not limited to:
Submitting work generated wholly or in part by AI tools (e.g., text, images, code, music) as one’s own without disclosure
Using AI-generated paraphrasing tools to evade plagiarism detection
Relying on AI-generated outputs without critically evaluating the content for accuracy, originality, and appropriateness
- Pratt does not provide a specific AI rule for exams or quizzes in the provided sources
- However, it says faculty should state AI expectations in assignment directions and syllabi, so any assessment-specific rules would be course-level rather than a uniform exam policy in the cited materials
The use of AI on course assignments is at the discretion of the faculty member and should be clearly stated in the course syllabus and assignment directions. Students are responsible for understanding the policy in each course and consulting with the faculty member if they are uncertain.
- Pratt permits AI to support learning when it is used responsibly, critically, and ethically
- The institution encourages AI use for tutoring, refining ideas, planning, and practice while requiring students to remain the authors of their own work and to evaluate outputs for accuracy and bias
Pratt encourages the use of AI as an educational aid and creative catalyst—as long as it is used critically, ethically, and transparently.
How can I use AI productively and ethically in my learning?
Use AI to help explain concepts, brainstorm ideas, or assist with planning—not as a substitute for your own learning, writing, or making.
Use AI to support, not replace, your development of foundational skills like writing, drawing, coding, and problem-solving.
Always evaluate AI outputs critically for bias, inaccuracy, or oversimplification. Ask yourself: Does this sound right? Does it reflect my intent? Is it appropriate for this context?
Keep records of your prompts and outputs when required by your instructor.
If your assignment permits AI use, disclose it clearly and cite it appropriately using your discipline’s preferred citation style.
- Pratt addresses coding assistance through a general rule rather than a separate programming policy
- AI use for coding is course-dependent, and students must follow instructor rules, disclose permitted use, and avoid submitting AI-generated code as their own without disclosure
The use of AI on course assignments is at the discretion of the faculty member and should be clearly stated in the course syllabus and assignment directions. Students are responsible for understanding the policy in each course and consulting with the faculty member if they are uncertain.
Use AI to support, not replace, your development of foundational skills like writing, drawing, coding, and problem-solving.
If your assignment permits AI use, disclose it clearly and cite it appropriately using your discipline’s preferred citation style.
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to generate content without proper attribution, permission, or verification is considered a violation of academic integrity standards. This includes but is not limited to:
Submitting work generated wholly or in part by AI tools (e.g., text, images, code, music) as one’s own without disclosure
Research
- The cited materials focus on course work and general academic integrity rather than research-writing-specific standards
- Pratt does not define a separate institution-wide policy for AI use in research papers, theses, dissertations, or manuscript preparation in the provided sources
not defined
- The provided sources do not specifically mention grants, IRB applications, or research ethics filings
- Pratt states broadly that AI-generated content must not be used without proper attribution, permission, or verification, and that users must critically evaluate outputs for accuracy and appropriateness
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to generate content without proper attribution, permission, or verification is considered a violation of academic integrity standards.
Relying on AI-generated outputs without critically evaluating the content for accuracy, originality, and appropriateness
Always evaluate AI outputs critically for bias, inaccuracy, or oversimplification. Ask yourself: Does this sound right? Does it reflect my intent? Is it appropriate for this context?
Academic Integrity
- Pratt requires attribution for non-original work, including AI-generated content, and says students must disclose AI use when assignments permit it
- The university also instructs students to follow the citation style appropriate to their discipline and to keep records of prompts and outputs when an instructor requires that
Students are expected to credit all works that are not original with appropriate citations and references. This includes quotations, paraphrases, models, images, and any AI-generated content used in their submissions.
If your assignment permits AI use, disclose it clearly and cite it appropriately using your discipline’s preferred citation style.
Keep records of your prompts and outputs when required by your instructor.
- The provided sources do not mention AI detection tools by name, but they do describe potential sanctions and review procedures
- Pratt treats undisclosed or unverified AI-generated work as a violation of academic integrity and routes violations through its existing academic misconduct process
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies to generate content without proper attribution, permission, or verification is considered a violation of academic integrity standards.
Submitting work generated wholly or in part by AI tools (e.g., text, images, code, music) as one’s own without disclosure
Using AI-generated paraphrasing tools to evade plagiarism detection
Relying on AI-generated outputs without critically evaluating the content for accuracy, originality, and appropriateness
Suspected violations of academic integrity are reviewed by the relevant faculty member and school administration and may result in disciplinary action, up to and including course failure, suspension, or expulsion.
Institutional & Administrative
- It also advises faculty to review AI outputs critically, protect student privacy, and stay informed about AI tools and policy updates
- Pratt says faculty may decide whether AI is allowed in their courses and should communicate those rules in syllabi and assignment directions
The use of AI on course assignments is at the discretion of the faculty member and should be clearly stated in the course syllabus and assignment directions.
The use of AI by faculty should be in line with the following principles:
Review AI-generated content critically for accuracy, fairness, and alignment with course learning objectives.
Protect student privacy—do not submit student work or personal data into AI platforms that do not meet institutional privacy standards.
Stay informed about evolving tools, practices, and policies through Pratt-supported workshops, guidance, and consultation.
As AI technologies continue to evolve, so too will Pratt’s guidance and support. We are committed to ongoing dialogue, policy refinement, and professional development to ensure that our use of AI remains aligned with our academic mission and values.
- Pratt instructs users not to upload confidential, personal, or student information into AI tools unless the platform has been institutionally approved
- It specifically directs faculty not to submit student work or personal data into platforms that do not meet institutional privacy standards, but the provided sources do not list approved platforms
Do not upload confidential or personal information into AI tools unless they are institutionally approved for such use.
Protect student privacy—do not submit student work or personal data into AI platforms that do not meet institutional privacy standards.
- Pratt presents an institution-wide AI approach centered on ethical, critical, and transparent use, with guidance framed around human creativity, inquiry, and integrity
- It also states that its AI guidance will continue to evolve through ongoing dialogue, policy refinement, and professional development, and it points users to institution-level AI resources and support
At Pratt Institute, we recognize that generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly part of the educational, creative, and professional landscape. As a community grounded in creativity, critical inquiry, and social responsibility, we aim to engage these technologies in ways that align with our values and support meaningful learning.
Pratt encourages the use of AI as an educational aid and creative catalyst—as long as it is used critically, ethically, and transparently.
As AI technologies continue to evolve, so too will Pratt’s guidance and support. We are committed to ongoing dialogue, policy refinement, and professional development to ensure that our use of AI remains aligned with our academic mission and values.
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About Pratt Institute's AI Policies
Pratt Institute has defined AI policies in 11 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 92%.
Pratt requires attribution for non-original work, including AI-generated content, and says students must disclose AI use when assignments permit it. The university also instructs students to follow the citation style appropriate to their discipline and to keep records of prompts and outputs when an instructor requires that.
Pratt treats undisclosed or unverified AI-generated work as a violation of academic integrity and routes violations through its existing academic misconduct process. The provided sources do not mention AI detection tools by name, but they do describe potential sanctions and review procedures.
Pratt instructs users not to upload confidential, personal, or student information into AI tools unless the platform has been institutionally approved. It specifically directs faculty not to submit student work or personal data into platforms that do not meet institutional privacy standards, but the provided sources do not list approved platforms.