Sarah Lawrence College has defined AI policies across 4 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation.
Using another’s words, information, data, images, and/or ideas and claiming those words, information, data, images, and/or ideas as one’s own, including the use of artificially generated materials (for example, with ChatGPT or DALL-E) without proper attribution, is plagiarism.
Using another’s words, information, data, images, and/or ideas and claiming those words, information, data, images, and/or ideas as one’s own, including the use of artificially generated materials (for example, with ChatGPT or DALL-E) without proper attribution, is plagiarism.
May I use AI in my admissions application? ChatGPT and other forms of AI can be useful for assistance with grammar and editing, but should not be used to create or substantially revise your application essays. Your submitted portfolio and all application materials should always be representative of your own ideas and writing.
Using another’s words, information, data, images, and/or ideas and claiming those words, information, data, images, and/or ideas as one’s own, including the use of artificially generated materials (for example, with ChatGPT or DALL-E) without proper attribution, is plagiarism.
Using another’s words, information, data, images, and/or ideas and claiming those words, information, data, images, and/or ideas as one’s own, including the use of artificially generated materials (for example, with ChatGPT or DALL-E) without proper attribution, is plagiarism.
How have you used AI in the preparation of your application to this program? Please describe specific uses of AI to help us understand your submission. Please note that applications will not be penalized for using AI as a tool as long as this use is properly disclosed.
Using another’s words, information, data, images, and/or ideas and claiming those words, information, data, images, and/or ideas as one’s own, including the use of artificially generated materials (for example, with ChatGPT or DALL-E) without proper attribution, is plagiarism.
Students found to have engaged in any of these prohibited acts are considered in violation of the college’s policy on academic integrity and are subject to the adjudication process and sanctions described below. Penalties can range from suspension of the student from a class to dismissal from the college.
Any graduate student found to be engaging in one of these prohibited acts will be considered in violation of Sarah Lawrence College’s policy on academic integrity and may be subject to sanctions such as failing the assignment, failing the course, and/or dismissal from the graduate program.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Sarah Lawrence College has defined AI policies in 4 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 33%.
The college requires proper attribution when students use AI-generated materials in academic work; using AI-generated content without attribution is treated as plagiarism in both undergraduate and graduate academic integrity policies. In the genetic counseling application, applicants must disclose specific AI use in preparing their application, and the program states that disclosed use will not be penalized.
The college does not mention AI detection tools in the provided sources. It does state that plagiarism, including unattributed AI-generated materials, is handled through standard academic misconduct processes and can lead to sanctions up to suspension or dismissal.
No explicit data protection or approved AI platform policy is currently defined in the available policy sources.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai