United States Air Force Academy AI Policy

ColoradoPublicLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
42%5 of 12
Permitted
Coursework
This university allows students to use AI tools in coursework, subject to course-level guidelines set by instructors.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

United States Air Force Academy has defined AI policies across 5 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. AI tools are generally permitted in coursework, subject to instructor guidelines. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI PermittedAttribution Required
  • AI use for graded coursework is governed through the cadet honor system rather than a tool-specific academic policy
  • The handbook also explicitly notes that developments in artificial intelligence have created honor-code challenges, but it does not provide a separate university-wide AI coursework rule beyond these honor requirements
  • The handbook states that cheating includes submitting someone else’s work, plagiarism, and receiving help without documenting it, and it directs cadets to clarify allowed collaboration with the instructor when course policy is unclear

4. Unique circumstances facing the Cadet Wing over the past few years with the Coronavirus pandemic paired with developments in technology like artificial intelligence have challenged and continue to challenge the Cadet Wing in terms of the Honor Code in unprecedented ways.

2.3.3. Cheat. Cheating is committing an act with the intent to receive undeserved credit or an unfair advantage. It also includes aiding or attempting to do the same.

2.3.3.1. Cheating can take many forms. Examples include the use of crib notes, submitting someone else’s work as your own, plagiarism, and receiving help but not documenting. The submission of undocumented work clearly implies it is the product of your own words or ideas, and you have not used this work for credit before. If you are unsure of a course policy, or what type of collaboration is allowed, clarify the matter with your instructor. If doubt exists, explain the situation to your instructor. This will allow you to exercise the responsibility and prudence expected of an honorable person, and there will be no deception.

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in Exams
  • The documents provided do not state a distinct AI-specific examination rule
  • AI use during exams or other assessments is not addressed in a separate AI exam policy
  • Under the honor handbook, cheating is prohibited when done to receive undeserved credit or an unfair advantage, and the listed examples include use of crib notes

2.3.3. Cheat. Cheating is committing an act with the intent to receive undeserved credit or an unfair advantage. It also includes aiding or attempting to do the same.

2.3.3.1. Cheating can take many forms. Examples include the use of crib notes, submitting someone else’s work as your own, plagiarism, and receiving help but not documenting.

U3Learning & Study Assistance
📋
No policy defined yet
U4Code Generation & Programming
📋
No policy defined yet
🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
📋
No policy defined yet
🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Citation Required
  • The policy is framed as an honor-code documentation requirement rather than an AI-specific citation rule
  • The honor handbook requires documentation of help and treats undocumented assistance as deceptive when work is submitted as one's own
  • When course policy or permitted collaboration is unclear, cadets are instructed to ask the instructor and explain the situation so there is no deception

2.3.3.1. Cheating can take many forms. Examples include the use of crib notes, submitting someone else’s work as your own, plagiarism, and receiving help but not documenting. The submission of undocumented work clearly implies it is the product of your own words or ideas, and you have not used this work for credit before. If you are unsure of a course policy, or what type of collaboration is allowed, clarify the matter with your instructor. If doubt exists, explain the situation to your instructor. This will allow you to exercise the responsibility and prudence expected of an honorable person, and there will be no deception.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools UsedIntegrity Process
  • The academy uses a cadet-run honor-code enforcement system
  • No AI-specific detection software is mentioned in the available sources
  • Respondents are formally notified via a Honor Allegation Notification and given the opportunity to admit or deny

Cadets are expected to report themselves for any violation. In addition, they must confront any other cadet they believe may have violated the Honor Code and report the incident if the situation is not resolved.

The figure below depicts the cadet owned and operated Honor Code System. The goal from Case Call-in to violation / no violation is 30 calendar days or less.

The goal from violation to Commandant's or Superintendent's decision is 60 days or less.

C.1.2. Investigation Conclusion. The IT must consult the CLA before formulating the allegation(s) on the Honor Allegation Notification(s) (HAN). The HAN informs the respondent of an allegation against them and their rights. It also provides the respondent the opportunity to admit or deny violating the Honor Code.

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
📋
No policy defined yet
U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
📋
No policy defined yet
U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • A separate document (COI.pdf) available on the USAFA domain was not reviewed and may contain additional institutional governance context
  • The handbook notes it is periodically revised in response to ever-changing demands and influences while its foundational principles remain unchanged
  • The available sources acknowledge artificial intelligence as a developing challenge for the Cadet Wing under the Honor Code but do not set out a broader university AI governance framework, committee structure, or adoption strategy

4. Unique circumstances facing the Cadet Wing over the past few years with the Coronavirus pandemic paired with developments in technology like artificial intelligence have challenged and continue to challenge the Cadet Wing in terms of the Honor Code in unprecedented ways.

5. Due to ever-changing demands and influences, this handbook is revised and strengthened periodically. However, the foundational principles that our Honor Code represents will forever remain unchanged.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About United States Air Force Academy's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai