University of Aberdeen has defined AI policies across 8 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for AI governance strategy.
The University expects that all students undertake their
studies with integrity and submit assessments for grading
that have been prepared by themselves.
Ensure you work independently on all
individual formative and summative
assessments.
The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism
and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.
“Plagiarism through the use of artificial intelligence tools is defined as the unauthorised or
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools to generate content for work submitted for
assessment.”
Complete all your academic courses
and assessments honestly.
The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism
and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.
“Plagiarism through the use of artificial intelligence tools is defined as the unauthorised or
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools to generate content for work submitted for
assessment.”
Reference and cite appropriately sources
(e.g., tables, figures and images) used in
assessments and other learning activities,
including the use of Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) tools e.g., ChatGPT.
• Generative tools, such as jenni.ai, perplexity.ai, dall-e-2.ai, GitHub Co-Pilot, ChatGPT
4.2.1. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT can perform a wide range of language-related tasks well,
such as translation, summarising, writing an essay, answering a question, producing “human-like” responses. These tools can also assist with coding tasks by providing code snippets and
examples in various programming languages. ChatGPT, and similar applications could,
therefore, be used by students to generate content that will be submitted for assessment.
The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism
and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.
Research integrity applies throughout the research life cycle, from the initial idea or concept to the
publication of research outcomes.
These guidelines describe the standards of good research conduct
which are required by the University and which are intended to satisfy the requirements of all funding
bodies. They apply to all individuals involved in research, including visiting researchers, research
support staff, students and research managers and professional support staff.
The onus is on researchers to establish that they have met the highest standard that could reasonably
be expected of them.
Reference and cite appropriately in
your work, acknowledging the work
and ideas of others.
Reference and cite appropriately sources
(e.g., tables, figures and images) used in
assessments and other learning activities,
including the use of Generative Artificial
Intelligence (GenAI) tools e.g., ChatGPT.
The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism
and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.
The unauthorised or unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools in work submitted for
assessment can be regarded as plagiarism because it involves presenting work or ideas
generated by an AI tool as one's own, without proper attribution or acknowledgement of the
source.
The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism
and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.
It is difficult to detect and, as with any other tools used to investigate cases of academic
misconduct, impossible to definitively prove that ChatGPT (or similar tools) have been used in
the generation of text. Some detection tools have been released and others are under
development, but these AI tools are constantly being developed and refined, making detection
a race that cannot be won. It is a more efficient use of time to focus on assessment design than
on detection.
Addressing the use of AI tools, particularly generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, under this
definition ensures that the current Code of Practice on Student Discipline can be utilised to
address unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in work submitted for assessment, with
clear guidance on how Schools can deal with it, as set out in Section 4.2 of the Code, “School
dealing with alleged Plagiarism/Collusion by students in taught courses at level 1-5”.
• Where the accusation relates to plagiarism, collusion or contract cheating, put the
thesis through the University’s plagiarism software checker (eg TurnitinUK) and
prepare a report on its findings. The Graduate’s permission is not required for this to
go through the plagiarism software checker;
POLICY AMENDMENTS TO ADDRESS DEVELOPMENTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS
This paper outlines a proposed amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic), for AY 2023-24, to address developments in Artificial Intelligence tools.
Previously
considered/approved by
Quality Assurance Committee 29 March 2023
Senate 19 April 2023
Further consideration/
approval required by
Court 21 June 2023
The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline
(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /
unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism
and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
University of Aberdeen has defined AI policies in 8 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 67%.
Students must reference and cite GenAI tools when they are used in assessments and other learning activities. If AI use is unacknowledged in work submitted for assessment, it is treated as plagiarism.
The university states that unauthorised or unacknowledged AI use in assessed work is handled as plagiarism or collusion under existing academic misconduct processes. It also states that AI detection is difficult and cannot definitively prove use, and for plagiarism allegations against postgraduate research graduates it may use the university plagiarism software checker such as TurnitinUK.
No explicit data protection or approved AI platform policy is currently defined in the available policy sources.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai