University of Aberdeen AI Policy

PrivateLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
67%8 of 12
Prohibited
Coursework
This university prohibits AI tool usage for coursework and assignments unless explicitly authorized by the instructor.
Required
Disclosure
Students must formally disclose and cite any AI assistance used when submitting academic work.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

University of Aberdeen has defined AI policies across 8 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI ProhibitedAttribution Required
  • For work submitted for assessment, students are expected to prepare the work themselves and work independently on individual assessments
  • The unauthorised or unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools to generate content for assessed work is prohibited and treated as plagiarism

The University expects that all students undertake their

studies with integrity and submit assessments for grading

that have been prepared by themselves.

Ensure you work independently on all

individual formative and summative

assessments.

The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism

and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.

“Plagiarism through the use of artificial intelligence tools is defined as the unauthorised or

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools to generate content for work submitted for

assessment.”

U2Examinations & Assessments
General Policy AppliesIntegrity Code Applies
  • The university applies its AI misconduct rule to work submitted for assessment
  • It requires students to complete assessments honestly, and unauthorised or unacknowledged AI-generated content in assessed work is treated as plagiarism

Complete all your academic courses

and assessments honestly.

The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism

and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.

“Plagiarism through the use of artificial intelligence tools is defined as the unauthorised or

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools to generate content for work submitted for

assessment.”

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for Study
  • The university does not define a separate rule on using AI for private study support, tutoring, or revision
  • The only explicit statement in the provided sources is that when GenAI tools are used in assessments and other learning activities, they must be appropriately referenced and cited

Reference and cite appropriately sources

(e.g., tables, figures and images) used in

assessments and other learning activities,

including the use of Generative Artificial

Intelligence (GenAI) tools e.g., ChatGPT.

U4Code Generation & Programming
AI Code RestrictedAttribution Required
  • For assessed work, unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI tools, including coding assistance, is prohibited and treated as plagiarism
  • The university identifies code assistance as a capability of AI tools and states that such tools could be used by students to generate content for assessment

• Generative tools, such as jenni.ai, perplexity.ai, dall-e-2.ai, GitHub Co-Pilot, ChatGPT

4.2.1. Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT can perform a wide range of language-related tasks well,

such as translation, summarising, writing an essay, answering a question, producing “human-like” responses. These tools can also assist with coding tasks by providing code snippets and

examples in various programming languages. ChatGPT, and similar applications could,

therefore, be used by students to generate content that will be submitted for assessment.

The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism

and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.

🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
📋
No policy defined yet
U6Research Data & Analysis
📋
No policy defined yet
U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Ethics Framework Active
  • However, the provided sources do not define AI-specific rules for grant proposals, ethics applications, or other research integrity declarations
  • The research governance material sets university-wide expectations that research integrity applies across the full research life cycle and to all individuals involved in research

Research integrity applies throughout the research life cycle, from the initial idea or concept to the

publication of research outcomes.

These guidelines describe the standards of good research conduct

which are required by the University and which are intended to satisfy the requirements of all funding

bodies. They apply to all individuals involved in research, including visiting researchers, research

support staff, students and research managers and professional support staff.

The onus is on researchers to establish that they have met the highest standard that could reasonably

be expected of them.

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure MandatoryCitation Required
  • If AI use is unacknowledged in work submitted for assessment, it is treated as plagiarism
  • Students must reference and cite GenAI tools when they are used in assessments and other learning activities

Reference and cite appropriately in

your work, acknowledging the work

and ideas of others.

Reference and cite appropriately sources

(e.g., tables, figures and images) used in

assessments and other learning activities,

including the use of Generative Artificial

Intelligence (GenAI) tools e.g., ChatGPT.

The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism

and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.

The unauthorised or unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools in work submitted for

assessment can be regarded as plagiarism because it involves presenting work or ideas

generated by an AI tool as one's own, without proper attribution or acknowledgement of the

source.

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools Used
  • The university states that unauthorised or unacknowledged AI use in assessed work is handled as plagiarism or collusion under existing academic misconduct processes
  • It also states that AI detection is difficult and cannot definitively prove use, and for plagiarism allegations against postgraduate research graduates it may use the university plagiarism software checker such as TurnitinUK

The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism

and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.

It is difficult to detect and, as with any other tools used to investigate cases of academic

misconduct, impossible to definitively prove that ChatGPT (or similar tools) have been used in

the generation of text. Some detection tools have been released and others are under

development, but these AI tools are constantly being developed and refined, making detection

a race that cannot be won. It is a more efficient use of time to focus on assessment design than

on detection.

Addressing the use of AI tools, particularly generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, under this

definition ensures that the current Code of Practice on Student Discipline can be utilised to

address unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in work submitted for assessment, with

clear guidance on how Schools can deal with it, as set out in Section 4.2 of the Code, “School

dealing with alleged Plagiarism/Collusion by students in taught courses at level 1-5”.

• Where the accusation relates to plagiarism, collusion or contract cheating, put the

thesis through the University’s plagiarism software checker (eg TurnitinUK) and

prepare a report on its findings. The Graduate’s permission is not required for this to

go through the plagiarism software checker;

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
📋
No policy defined yet
U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
📋
No policy defined yet
U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body ActiveAI Strategy Defined
  • The university approved a formal amendment to its academic misconduct framework to address developments in AI tools for the 2023/24 academic year
  • The material shows this was considered through the Quality Assurance Committee, Senate, and Court, but the provided sources do not set out a broader institution-wide AI strategy beyond this policy change

POLICY AMENDMENTS TO ADDRESS DEVELOPMENTS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS

This paper outlines a proposed amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic), for AY 2023-24, to address developments in Artificial Intelligence tools.

Previously

considered/approved by

Quality Assurance Committee 29 March 2023

Senate 19 April 2023

Further consideration/

approval required by

Court 21 June 2023

The Court is invited to approve an amendment to the Code of Practice on Student Discipline

(Academic) for Academic Year 2023/2024, which states that the unauthorized /

unacknowledged use of artificial intelligence tools will be treated as a form of plagiarism

and will therefore be dealt with in the same way as plagiarism/collusion.

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About University of Aberdeen's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai