University of California, Santa Barbara AI Policy

CaliforniaPublicLast Updated: February 2026

Academic IntegrityInstitutional & AdministrativeResearchTeaching & Learning
Visit Website ↗
Policy Coverage
100%12 of 12
Permitted
Coursework
This university allows students to use AI tools in coursework, subject to course-level guidelines set by instructors.
Recommended
Disclosure
The university encourages students to disclose AI usage, though it may not be strictly mandatory in all courses.
Tools Active
Detection
The university employs AI detection software (such as Turnitin or similar tools) to identify AI-generated content in submissions.
Committee Active
Governance
The university has established a dedicated committee, task force, or working group to oversee AI governance.
POLICY OVERVIEW

AI Policy Summary

University of California, Santa Barbara has defined AI policies across 12 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.

📚

Teaching & Learning

U1Coursework & Assignments
AI Prohibited
  • UCSB states that use of AI writing-assistance technologies for coursework is not allowed unless specifically permitted by the instructor or supervisor
  • Separately, the Office of Teaching and Learning states there is no formal UCSB/UC system policy on generative AI in teaching and learning, allowing instructors to set their own class policies
  • The Office of Student Conduct lists using artificial-intelligence programs without prior instructor approval and unauthorized use of artificial-intelligence programs to complete course work as examples of plagiarism/academic dishonesty

“Materials (written or otherwise) submitted to fulfill academic requirements must represent a student’s own efforts unless otherwise permitted by an instructor.” Therefore, student use of AI-assistive technology for writing is not allowed in courses, on theses, dissertations, research articles, etc.

unless specifically allowed by the instructor or supervisor.

“Neither UCSB nor the UC system has a formal policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, thereby allowing instructors to formulate their own class policies.”

“Taking credit for any work you did not create including, but not limited to, books, articles, methodology, results, compositions, images, lectures, computer programs, internet postings, or utilizing artificial-intelligence programs without prior approval from instructor”

“Unauthorized use of artificial-intelligence programs to complete course work”

U2Examinations & Assessments
AI Prohibited in ExamsIntegrity Code Applies
  • UCSB's Office of Student Conduct identifies use of unauthorized materials or electronic devices during an exam as cheating
  • UCSB's OTL states that there is no formal UCSB/UC system policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, allowing instructors to set their own policies, but the provided sources do not specifically define AI use during exams beyond general exam cheating rules

“Using any unauthorized material such as notes, cheat sheets, or electronic devices during an exam”

“Neither UCSB nor the UC system has a formal policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, thereby allowing instructors to formulate their own class policies.”

U3Learning & Study Assistance
AI Encouraged for Study
  • UCSB's OTL also states there is no formal UCSB/UC system policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, allowing instructors to set their own class policies
  • UCSB's Office of Teaching and Learning provides examples of students using AI for practice questions and tutoring, and recommends that if instructors allow student AI use, they position it as a tool for specific tasks such as translation support or as a study tool

“A student inputs your practice quiz questions into AI and asks it to create ten more questions similar in topic and level of difficulty so they can practice for the exam.”

“A student uploads your course slides, readings, and their own notes into an AI bot that they created as a tutor to help them with homework and prepare for exams.”

“If you do allow students to use AI, position it as a tool for specific tasks (e.g. translation support or as a study tool).”

“Neither UCSB nor the UC system has a formal policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, thereby allowing instructors to formulate their own class policies.”

U4Code Generation & Programming
AI Coding Allowed
  • UCSB's OTL also states there is no formal UCSB/UC system policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, allowing instructors to set their own class policies
  • UCSB's OTL guidance recognizes that AI-assistive technologies can support composing including coding, and it includes an example scenario of students asking AI to help create and debug programming code for homework

“UCSB’s Office of Teaching and Learning recognizes significant opportunities and challenges associated with the widespread accessibility of AI-assistive technologies, including those that assist with forms of composing like writing, coding, drawing, and completing equations.”

“Students ask an AI to help them create and debug programming code for their homework.”

“Neither UCSB nor the UC system has a formal policy on generative AI in teaching and learning contexts, thereby allowing instructors to formulate their own class policies.”

🔬

Research

U5Research Writing & Manuscript Preparation
AI Writing Permitted
  • The memo frames AI-writing assistance under academic integrity expectations for materials submitted to fulfill academic requirements
  • UCSB's OTL memo states that student use of AI-assistive technology for writing is not allowed for research articles unless specifically allowed by the instructor or supervisor

“Materials (written or otherwise) submitted to fulfill academic requirements must represent a student’s own efforts unless otherwise permitted by an instructor.” Therefore, student use of AI-assistive technology for writing is not allowed in courses, on theses, dissertations, research articles, etc.

unless specifically allowed by the instructor or supervisor.

U6Research Data & Analysis
Data Policy Defined
  • UCSB IT security guidance states that AI can improve research, coding, and analysis, while warning about data leakage risks in AI tools and advising against inputting sensitive or proprietary data into public AI tools
  • UCSB CIO guidelines also provide technical and security guidance focused on data management and protection, including privacy, security, vendor evaluation, and consulting security/privacy offices when incorporating P3/P4 data

“Artificial intelligence can improve one's research, coding, and analysis.”

“Another key concern with many AI tools is data leakage, which is the unintentional exposure of private or sensitive information. Some AI applications may store, share, or reuse whatever users input. A simple prompt could accidentally send confidential data into models that are not designed to protect it.”

“Avoid inputting sensitive or proprietary data into public AI tools.”

“Ensure third-party AI systems comply with privacy regulations such as FERPA and GLBA.”

“Users who seek to incorporate P3/P4 data should contact the Chief Information Security Officer's office and may also need to contact UCSB Human Resources for employee data. They may also need to contact the Campus Privacy Officer.”

U7Research Ethics & Integrity
Ethics Framework Active
  • The CIO AI-use guidelines emphasize ethical use and encourage reviewing the University of California's AI Principles for ethical considerations
  • UCSB's OTL memo places AI writing technologies within the purview of the Student Conduct Code and states that materials submitted to fulfill academic requirements must represent a student's own efforts unless otherwise permitted by an instructor; it then states student use of AI-assistive technology for writing is not allowed in research articles unless allowed by the instructor or supervisor

“The use of AI writing technologies falls within the purview of the Student Conduct Code and the Student Guide to Academic Integrity. It states that “Materials (written or otherwise) submitted to fulfill academic requirements must represent a student’s own efforts unless otherwise permitted by an instructor.” Therefore, student use of AI-assistive technology for writing is not allowed in courses, on theses, dissertations, research articles, etc.

unless specifically allowed by the instructor or supervisor.”

“These guidelines, developed by the UCSB ITC Subcommittee on AI, are intended to serve as guidance for members of the campus community who engage with AI for research, teaching, administrative work, and other university-associated functions.”

“We encourage you to review the University of California's AI Principles to learn more about ethical considerations before working with AI.”

🎓

Academic Integrity

U8Disclosure & Attribution Requirements
Disclosure Recommended
  • UCSB's Writing Program policy expects students to acknowledge any and all assistance received from AI writing technology
  • UCSB CIO AI guidelines also state that individuals should be informed when AI-enabled tools are being used and that when individuals are permitted or forbidden to use AI tools, this should be made clear by the implementing units
  • UCSB's OTL teaching guidance notes that many instructors use an AI-attribution clause for assignments in which students describe and reflect on their AI use, and recommends that if instructors use AI they show how they cite/attribute AI usage

“We expect students to maintain academic integrity and honesty while using AI writing technology, acknowledging any and all assistance received from these tools.”

“Many instructors have different policies for each assignment and/or an AI-attribution clause for assignments in which students describe and reflect on their use of AI”

“If you use AI, show how you cite/attribute AI usage.”

“Individuals should be informed when AI-enabled tools are being used. When individuals are permitted or forbidden to use AI tools, or when individual or campus unit data is used to train AI-enabled tools, this should be made clear by the units implementing the AI tools.”

U9Detection & Enforcement
Detection Tools Used
  • UCSB also warns that submitting student work to AI-writing/plagiarism detector databases may violate students’ intellectual property rights and could lead to loss of ownership and reduced ability for the instructor/university to safeguard sharing and use
  • UCSB's OTL states that AI detection tools are not accepted by the UCSB Office of Student Conduct as sole evidence for academic dishonesty due to known inaccuracies; determinations are based on a preponderance of evidence and may include comparisons to prior work, oral discussion, or other indicators

“While AI detection software exists, the UCSB Office of Student Conduct does not accept these tools as sole evidence for academic dishonesty due to their known inaccuracies.”

“If misuse of AI is suspected, the determination will be based on a "preponderance of evidence," which may include a comparison to students’ previous work, an oral discussion of the submitted work, or other indicators of a substantial change in writing style or content that suggests unauthorized assistance.”

“Submitting student work to anti-plagiarism software may violate students’ intellectual property rights. When student work is uploaded into a AI-Writing/plagiarism detector database, the student may lose ownership of their work and the instructor/University unable to safeguard how it is shared and used in the electronic commons.”

🏛️

Institutional & Administrative

U10Faculty & Staff Use
Staff GuidelinesRestricted Use
  • UCSB's CIO AI overview states the AI guidelines and resources apply to students, faculty, and staff using AI in coursework, research, and administration
  • UCSB provides a Google AI Pro for Education program limited to faculty, staff, and researchers (students and graduate students are not eligible), and selected participants must agree to onboarding and surveys
  • UCSB's OTL teaching guidance states that AI should not be used to provide direct feedback on student work, though it may be used to analyze work for patterns or to generate sample comments if consent is obtained

“AI should not be used to provide direct feedback on student work. It is possible to use AI to analyze student work for common patterns, generate categories of success or areas of challenge, or create a set of sample comments; however, you must obtain consent.”

“All faculty, staff and researchers are eligible for this program. Students and graduate students are not eligible.”

“Selected participants must agree to complete a brief onboarding module and participate in 2-3 short feedback surveys to help evaluate the success of this pilot.”

“These guidelines and resources are for all students, faculty, and staff at UCSB who use generative AI and/or machine learning in coursework, research, and administration.”

U11Institutional Data Protection & Approved AI Platforms
Approved Tools ListedData Protection Active
  • UCSB IT security guidance warns that using non-approved tools may reduce control over how information is stored or used and recommends not sharing personal details and avoiding sensitive/proprietary data in public AI tools
  • UCSB CIO technical guidelines include privacy/security requirements, vendor deletion of UC data at contract end, and direct users seeking to incorporate P3/P4 data to contact information security and potentially HR and the Campus Privacy Officer
  • UCSB states that non-student employees have access to campus-approved AI tools (Google Gemini Web App and NotebookLM) via campus-issued Google accounts and that, under the UC agreement, data and conversations are not used to train Google's models and will not be accessed by human reviewers

“All UCSB non-student employees now have access to the Google Gemini Web App and NotebookLM through campus-issued Google accounts.”

“Your access to these tools through the UC agreement is protected by the University of California’s data and privacy policies. This means that your data and conversations are not used to train Google's generative AI models and will not be accessed by human reviewers.”

“When you use tools other than Google Gemini Web App and NotebookLM, like OpenAI’s ChatGTP, you may lose control over how your information is stored or used. Many public AI services use your data to train future models or share it with third parties.”

“For best practices on safe AI use:

* Do not share personal details (home address, phone number, SSN, ID numbers).

* Avoid inputting sensitive or proprietary data into public AI tools.”

“Vendors must also delete all UC data when a contract ends.”

“Users who seek to incorporate P3/P4 data should contact the Chief Information Security Officer's office and may also need to contact UCSB Human Resources for employee data. They may also need to contact the Campus Privacy Officer.”

U12University AI Governance & Strategy
Governance Body Active
  • UCSB also states the University should remain aware of general AI developments, especially for enterprise-level technologies for which the University has contracted
  • UCSB's AI-use guidelines were developed by the UCSB ITC Subcommittee on AI and include a statement that UCSB should adopt policies, processes, and structures to ensure adherence and accountability to its AI principles, including providing a clear process for individuals to express concerns
  • UCSB states it is actively evaluating how the campus community can benefit from AI and exploring potential impacts, and that the Office of the CIO is working with appropriate campus leadership to develop area-specific information for research, instruction, workplace productivity, and student life

“UC Santa Barbara is actively evaluating how the campus community can benefit from AI and exploring its potential impacts. The Office of the CIO provides general guidelines, definitions, and resources, and is working with appropriate campus leadership to develop area-specific information related to research, instruction, workplace productivity, and student life.”

“These guidelines, developed by the UCSB ITC Subcommittee on AI, are intended to serve as guidance for members of the campus community who engage with AI for research, teaching, administrative work, and other university-associated functions.”

“The University of California Santa Barbara should adopt appropriate policies, processes, and structures to ensure that the University consistently enacts and pursues adherence and accountability to the above principles in its development, use, and regulation of the use of AI systems. In implementing AI tools the University and/or its relevant units should provide a clear process for individuals to express concerns about their use.”

“The University should remain aware of general AI developments, especially in conjunction with enterprise-level technologies for which the University has contracted, and ensure that these are consistent with the principles outlined in this document.”

DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity

Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Common Questions About University of California, Santa Barbara's AI Policies

📋

Verify this Information

Related Universities

Same State or Region

Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai