University of Dayton has defined AI policies across 10 of 12 policy categories, covering Academic Integrity, Institutional & Administrative, Research, Teaching & Learning. The university prohibits the use of AI tools in coursework unless explicitly permitted by instructors. Students are required to disclose and attribute AI-generated content in their academic work. The university employs detection and enforcement mechanisms for unauthorized AI use. Research-related AI policies address manuscript preparation, data analysis, research ethics. At the institutional level, the university has established guidelines for faculty and staff AI use, data protection and approved AI tools, AI governance strategy.
At UD, students build the knowledge and skills to use AI effectively and responsibly, preparing them to learn and lead in an increasingly AI-enabled world. This means that Flyers understand not only when to use AI but also when not to use it — and how to evaluate AI outputs.
Our curriculum is constantly evolving to prepare students for an ever-changing world. All UD students receive an introduction to the fundamentals of AI and explore questions about AI and human dignity in their first year-courses. They build on that foundation through the second-year writing seminar, enhancing their analytical skills and applying their growing understanding of AI to written communication. Upperclass students learn how to apply AI in ways that are appropriate for their major and profession.
Unless specifically permitted by your professor (e.g., Grammarly; BriefCatch), using Artificial Intelligence is considered an act of academic dishonesty when it comes to class assignments.
The VLCFF prohibits the use of generative AI, such as ChatGPT, in any written work for exercises and discussion boards. All written work must be the student's original ideas, and any outside sources used, such as textbooks or articles, must be cited appropriately.
At UD, students build the knowledge and skills to use AI effectively and responsibly, preparing them to learn and lead in an increasingly AI-enabled world. This means that Flyers understand not only when to use AI but also when not to use it — and how to evaluate AI outputs.
At UD, students build the knowledge and skills to use AI effectively and responsibly. Our curriculum is constantly evolving to prepare students for an ever-changing world. All UD students receive an introduction to the fundamentals of AI and explore questions about AI and human dignity in their first-year courses. They build on that foundation through advanced writing and rhetoric courses that build analytical skills and challenge them to apply their growing understanding of AI to written communication.
Students engage with AI in ways that are appropriate for their major and profession.
Research Record means: the record of data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientific inquiry. Data or results may be in physical or electronic form.
Examples of items, materials, or information that may be considered part of the research record include, but are not limited to, research proposals, raw data, processed data, clinical research records, laboratory records, study records, laboratory notebooks, progress reports, manuscripts, abstracts, theses, records of oral presentations, online content, lab meeting reports, and journal articles.
Research Misconduct is defined as: fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. It does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
Plagiarism is defined as: the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
Research Record means: the record of data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientific inquiry. Data or results may be in physical or electronic form.
Examples of items, materials, or information that may be considered part of the research record include, but are not limited to, research proposals, raw data, processed data, clinical research records, laboratory records, study records, laboratory notebooks, progress reports, manuscripts, abstracts, theses, records of oral presentations, online content, lab meeting reports, and journal articles.
Fabrication is defined as: making up data or results and recording or reporting them.
Falsification is defined as: manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes; or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
Research Responsibilities: the scholar/researcher is responsible for the conduct of research and supervising other researchers, students, and staff personnel to promote high ethical standards in the conduct of such research. These standards include detecting irregular practices in research and scholarship procedures, handling data and results, introducing remedial measures in case of innocent mistakes, and investigating and eliminating willful fraud.
Using AI tools that aren’t officially contracted by UD. These may collect and train on any data you provide.
Research Misconduct is defined as: fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. It does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
Plagiarism is defined as: the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
All written work must be the student's original ideas, and any outside sources used, such as textbooks or articles, must be cited appropriately.
Plagiarism includes using the words, thoughts, or ideas of another without attribution consistent with standard legal citation manuals (e.g., ALWD Citation Manual or Bluebook), so that they seem as if they are your own. Depending on the circumstances, proper attribution should include a citation, as well as quotation marks.
Using any form of AI can be plagiarism. While AI will likely play a role in research and writing in the future, you need to practice legal research and writing on your own first. Passing off another’s words in your class assignments as your own, which includes a computer program’s words, is considered impermissible plagiarism when it comes to class assignments.
In the event that the use of generative AI is suspected, the work will be checked by one or more AI detection programs. If plagiarism, the uncredited use of another's work, is suspected, the work will also be checked.
If a strong indication of AI or plagiarism is determined, the student will be asked to resubmit the work.
Unless specifically permitted by your professor (e.g., Grammarly; BriefCatch), using Artificial Intelligence is considered an act of academic dishonesty when it comes to class assignments.
Students sometimes make minor mistakes in completing academic assignments. While one missing citation in an assignment may, in most instances, be considered a careless mistake rather than academic dishonesty, multiple instances of failing to provide proper attribution through quotation marks and/or citations will give rise to an inference that you have inappropriately used the work of others and will be reported to the Honor Council.
As the UD community continues exploring how AI can enhance teaching, learning, research, and administration, it’s important to balance the power of these tools with our responsibilities, especially when it comes to data.
Faculty and staff explore AI through faith, ethics and education.
Together, the three groups above carefully consider things like authentication, role-based authorization, compliance requirements, server best practices, data-specific training, the effects of new technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, etc., to help ensure that University Systems are architected appropriately.
The four classification levels laid out above comprise the entirety of the University’s data classification categories.
As the UD community continues exploring how AI can enhance teaching, learning, research, and administration, it’s important to balance the power of these tools with our responsibilities, especially when it comes to data.
Using AI tools that aren’t officially contracted by UD. These may collect and train on any data you provide.
Sharing sensitive results with people who aren’t authorized to see them, sometimes unintentionally.
Our AI strategy, rooted in our Catholic and Marianist identity, is guided by five core principles.
Human Thriving and Human-Centered Use: Center human intelligence and responsibility that respects the dignity of each person and promotes the common good.
Ethical, Equitable, and Responsible Use: Ensure accessible, equitable, and inclusive access to AI tools and resources, guided by ethical standards of transparency, accountability, sustainability, and privacy. Proactively account for bias and misuse, maintain human oversight, and foster ethical reasoning across UD.
Student-Centric Approach: Engage with AI to enhance the student learning experience, support their well-being, and prepare them for future careers.
Innovation and Research: Foster a culture of critical experimentation and research in AI, contributing to advancements in the field and interdisciplinary collaboration.
Organizational Excellence and Efficiency: Advance organizational excellence and operational efficiency through bold, strategic use of AI to streamline and strengthen University performance, optimize campus operations, and further UD’s mission and identity.
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
University of Dayton has defined AI policies in 10 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 83%.
The provided sources do not set a university-wide AI disclosure rule. In program-specific policies, VLCFF requires outside sources in written work to be cited appropriately, and the Legal Profession Program requires attribution consistent with legal citation standards; it also states that using AI-generated words as one's own in class assignments is plagiarism.
VLCFF explicitly uses AI detection as an enforcement mechanism: suspected generative AI use may be checked by one or more AI detection programs, and students may be asked to resubmit work if there is a strong indication of AI or plagiarism. In the Legal Profession Program, unauthorized AI use in class assignments is treated as academic dishonesty, and plagiarism-related violations may be reported to the Honor Council.
The university ties AI use to its data protection rules. It warns against using AI tools that are not officially contracted by UD because those tools may collect and train on submitted data, and it emphasizes that the community must handle information according to university classification levels and avoid sharing sensitive results with unauthorized people.
Disclaimer:* All university AI policy information presented on this platform is compiled from publicly available information, official university websites, and related academic sources. This data reflects information available at the time of last verification as on 27th February 2026. University and institution names referenced on this platform are the property and trademarks of their respective institutions. Their inclusion does not imply any affiliation with, endorsement by, or partnership with those institutions. Policy coverage scores and categorical indicators are automated assessments derived from available documentation and are provided for informational and comparative purposes only. They do not constitute legal, academic, or compliance advice. Users are advised to exercise their own judgement and independently verify all policy information directly with the respective university before making any academic or institutional decisions. For any queries or corrections, please contact us at support@trinka.ai