Teaching & Learning
- The policy also states that examination regulations may set additional or different rules
- Students remain responsible for ensuring proper scientific practice and must critically review AI-generated outputs
- Students may use AI tools to support their studies, but using AI-generated texts or images in assessed coursework is not allowed if it falsely suggests independent work
The use of AI tools and the use of AI-generated content are not prohibited at the University of Regensburg. However, according to legal provisions, students remain obligated to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. This means that they may use AI tools only in such a way and only to the extent that they themselves can critically evaluate the contributions made by generative AI.
The use of AI-generated texts or images in examinations or assessed coursework can lead to the false impression that these are the students' own independent work and may therefore violate examination regulations or the principles of good scientific practice.
In individual cases, examination regulations may provide more specific rules regarding the use of AI.
- AI use in examinations and assessed work is restricted where it could misrepresent AI-generated content as the student's own work
- Specific examination rules may impose more detailed requirements, so the position is partly governed by applicable examination regulations rather than a single blanket rule
The use of AI-generated texts or images in examinations or assessed coursework can lead to the false impression that these are the students' own independent work and may therefore violate examination regulations or the principles of good scientific practice.
In individual cases, examination regulations may provide more specific rules regarding the use of AI.
- The university also presents AI as something that can be used in studies and encourages building competency in handling it responsibly
- The university permits students to use AI tools for learning support as long as they use them only to the extent that they can critically assess the outputs
This means that they may use AI tools only in such a way and only to the extent that they themselves can critically evaluate the contributions made by generative AI.
Artificial intelligence can support students in their studies if they know how to use it correctly and responsibly.
Research
- This applies to academic writing insofar as AI-generated content must not undermine standards of independent scholarly work
- The university does not prohibit AI tools in academic work, but researchers and students must follow good scientific practice and may use AI only when they can critically evaluate the generated contribution
The use of AI tools and the use of AI-generated content are not prohibited at the University of Regensburg. However, according to legal provisions, students remain obligated to comply with the principles of good scientific practice. This means that they may use AI tools only in such a way and only to the extent that they themselves can critically evaluate the contributions made by generative AI.
The use of AI in teaching and research is often possible and can have many advantages. However, there are legal and ethical challenges that everyone should be aware of.
- Its explicit requirement is that users must be aware of legal and ethical challenges
- The university states that AI may often be used in research, but it does not set a specific rule here for data collection, analysis, synthetic data, or interpretation
The use of AI in teaching and research is often possible and can have many advantages. However, there are legal and ethical challenges that everyone should be aware of.
- The university requires compliance with principles of good scientific practice when using AI
- It also emphasizes that AI use in research raises legal and ethical challenges that users need to consider
However, according to legal provisions, students remain obligated to comply with the principles of good scientific practice.
The use of AI in teaching and research is often possible and can have many advantages. However, there are legal and ethical challenges that everyone should be aware of.
Academic Integrity
- The university does not provide a general disclosure or citation rule for AI use on the cited page
- It does, however, state that using AI-generated material in assessed work can create a false impression of independent authorship, and additional rules may be set in examination regulations
The use of AI-generated texts or images in examinations or assessed coursework can lead to the false impression that these are the students' own independent work and may therefore violate examination regulations or the principles of good scientific practice.
In individual cases, examination regulations may provide more specific rules regarding the use of AI.
- The university says that improper AI use in examinations or assessed coursework may violate examination regulations or good scientific practice
- It does not define any AI detection tools or specific penalty process on the cited page, and instead points to examination regulations for possible case-specific rules
The use of AI-generated texts or images in examinations or assessed coursework can lead to the false impression that these are the students' own independent work and may therefore violate examination regulations or the principles of good scientific practice.
In individual cases, examination regulations may provide more specific rules regarding the use of AI.
Institutional & Administrative
- The university states generally that AI use in teaching is often possible and can offer advantages, but it does not define specific rules for faculty or staff uses such as grading, lesson planning, recommendation letters, or administrative communications on the cited page
The use of AI in teaching and research is often possible and can have many advantages.
- The university indicates that legal and ethical challenges apply to AI use, but it does not define approved platforms, prohibited tools, or data-classification rules on the cited page
However, there are legal and ethical challenges that everyone should be aware of.
- No specific committee structure, governance framework, or institutional roadmap is defined on the cited page
- The university presents a general institutional position that AI use in teaching and research is often possible and beneficial, while also stressing awareness of legal and ethical challenges
The use of AI in teaching and research is often possible and can have many advantages. However, there are legal and ethical challenges that everyone should be aware of.
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About University of Regensburg's AI Policies
University of Regensburg has defined AI policies in 11 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 92%.
The university does not provide a general disclosure or citation rule for AI use on the cited page. It does, however, state that using AI-generated material in assessed work can create a false impression of independent authorship, and additional rules may be set in examination regulations.
The university says that improper AI use in examinations or assessed coursework may violate examination regulations or good scientific practice. It does not define any AI detection tools or specific penalty process on the cited page, and instead points to examination regulations for possible case-specific rules.
The university indicates that legal and ethical challenges apply to AI use, but it does not define approved platforms, prohibited tools, or data-classification rules on the cited page.