Teaching & Learning
- The university employs a decentralized, instructor-led approach to AI in coursework
- Unauthorized use of AI is considered a violation of the university's Academic Honesty Policy
- Faculty are provided with guidance and sample syllabus statements to either permit, limit, or prohibit the use of AI tools in their courses
This document is designed to guide faculty in deciding on and communicating their course-level policies on artificial intelligence (AI). ... Unauthorized use of AI tools would be a violation of Pacific’s Academic Honesty Policy, which prohibits: '[C]heating is the use of unauthorized information, study aids, or the work of others in an academic exercise.'
- The use of artificial intelligence in examinations is governed by the university's Academic Honesty Policy
- Any use of AI or other study aids not explicitly authorized by the instructor for an exam or academic exercise is considered cheating
Unauthorized use of AI tools would be a violation of Pacific’s Academic Honesty Policy, which prohibits: '[C]heating is the use of unauthorized information, study aids, or the work of others in an academic exercise. This includes, but is not limited to, the use of materials in an examination or other academic exercise that have not been authorized by the instructor.'
- The university libraries provide student-focused instruction on using generative AI responsibly in academic work, but the available source text does not state a binding rule that permits or prohibits specific study-assistance uses
This three-part video series, developed by University of the Pacific Library & Learning Center, offers students a comprehensive introduction to generative AI technology. From understanding the basics to exploring practical applications and ethical considerations, these workshops provide the essential knowledge needed to use AI tools responsibly in your academic journey at Pacific.
Each concise session is designed to build your AI literacy and confidence while ensuring responsible engagement with these emerging technologies.
- Faculty may choose to permit, limit, or prohibit AI use for programming assignments, and unauthorized use constitutes an academic integrity violation
- The university does not have a separate policy for AI-based code generation; it is covered by the general, instructor-led framework for AI in coursework
This document is designed to guide faculty in deciding on and communicating their course-level policies on artificial intelligence (AI). ... Examples of Cheating (from the Tiger Lore): ... Unauthorized use of information, notes or study aids in any academic exercise or examination.
Research
- The journal excludes routine spelling, grammar, or general editing from that disclosure requirement
- For the Oral Health journal, authors who use AI in developing any portion of a manuscript must disclose that use transparently and thoroughly in specified sections of the manuscript
For authors: If Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been used in the development of any portion of a manuscript, its use must be transparently and thoroughly documented in the Methods section, a disclosure statement, or the Acknowledgements section, as appropriate. However, AI tools used strictly for spelling, grammar, or general editing purposes do not require disclosure.
- For the Oral Health journal, generative AI use is governed by confidentiality, privacy, and copyright protections
- Peer reviewers are prohibited from uploading any manuscript content to generative AI tools, and any AI assistance used to refine a review report must be explicitly disclosed
The use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools, including ChatGPT, Google Bard, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, and similar large language model-based platforms, must be carefully managed to protect confidentiality, privacy, and copyright integrity.
For peer reviewers: Under no circumstances should any part of a manuscript (including text, figures, or tables) be uploaded to GenAI tools. If AI-assisted tools are used to refine a peer review report, this must be explicitly disclosed.
Academic Integrity
- The university has multiple disclosure requirements for AI use
- Additionally, a specific journal policy requires authors to document AI use in their manuscripts
- Faculty are provided with sample syllabus language that requires students to cite any AI tool used
Sample Syllabus Statement: In our course, you are welcome to use generative AI tools on all your assignments. You must cite any generative AI tool you use. ... Nursing Handbook: The use of Generative AI tools (ChatGPT, etc…) is an example of cheating if not appropriately cited as the original author. If used, it must be declared and cited appropriately for all academic work submitted.
- Enforcement of AI misuse falls under the university's existing Academic Honesty Policy
- The faculty guidance document explicitly states that unauthorized use of AI tools is a violation of this policy, which can result in penalties up to and including a grade of 'F' in the course, suspension, or dismissal
Unauthorized use of AI tools would be a violation of Pacific’s Academic Honesty Policy... Cheating... Possible Sanctions (from the Tiger Lore): Depending upon the nature of the case, the student may be assigned a grade of 'F' in the course; 'F' for the work; suspension; dismissal.
Institutional & Administrative
- The university provides explicit guidance for faculty on managing AI in their courses
- The guidance also warns faculty against inputting confidential or student data into unvetted AI tools
- Faculty are responsible for setting and communicating their own course-level AI policies and are provided with sample syllabus statements and considerations for implementation
This document is designed to guide faculty in deciding on and communicating their course-level policies on artificial intelligence (AI). ... Be aware of the data privacy and security of AI tools. Unless a tool has been vetted and approved by Pacific, do not input any confidential, proprietary, or private information into it, including student information and unpublished research data.
- The university has issued a data protection directive for faculty regarding AI
- Faculty are warned not to input any confidential, proprietary, private, student, or unpublished research data into AI tools unless the tool has been officially vetted and approved by the university
Be aware of the data privacy and security of AI tools. Unless a tool has been vetted and approved by Pacific, do not input any confidential, proprietary, or private information into it, including student information and unpublished research data.
- The university's AI governance strategy is characterized by a decentralized, instructor-led model for academic use, supported by central guidance for faculty
- Key strategic elements include providing resources for faculty to create their own course policies, educating students on responsible use through the library, and issuing a university-level warning on data privacy with unvetted AI tools
This document is designed to guide faculty in deciding on and communicating their course-level policies on artificial intelligence (AI). ... This three-part video series... offers students a comprehensive introduction to generative AI technology... Be aware of the data privacy and security of AI tools. Unless a tool has been vetted and approved by Pacific, do not input any confidential, proprietary, or private information into it...
DocuMark: Responsible AI Use for Academic Integrity
Knowing your institution's AI policy is step one. DocuMark helps enforce it fairly by empowering universities to manage AI-generated content, prevent cheating, and support student writing through responsible AI use.
Common Questions About University of the Pacific's AI Policies
University of the Pacific has defined AI policies in 11 of 12 categories, with an overall coverage score of 92%.
The university has multiple disclosure requirements for AI use. Faculty are provided with sample syllabus language that requires students to cite any AI tool used. The School of Nursing student handbooks state that AI use must be declared and cited appropriately. Additionally, a specific journal policy requires authors to document AI use in their manuscripts.
Enforcement of AI misuse falls under the university's existing Academic Honesty Policy. The faculty guidance document explicitly states that unauthorized use of AI tools is a violation of this policy, which can result in penalties up to and including a grade of 'F' in the course, suspension, or dismissal.
The university has issued a data protection directive for faculty regarding AI. Faculty are warned not to input any confidential, proprietary, private, student, or unpublished research data into AI tools unless the tool has been officially vetted and approved by the university.